Charles Wilson wrote:
The real bone of contention is "tk" and "itk" alone. How can we have a
cygwin-X tk and a cygwin-GDI tk on the same machine.
Hopefully in *exactly* the same way that I can run XEmacs either with or
without X up and running.
Robert Collins wrote:
> * Get some feedback from the users.
What does the "Keep" radio button for?
The "Not Installed" view totally rocks. I love it.
I don't suppose there will ever be a
"never-install-so-don't-ever-show-it-to-me" view?
Joshua Daniel Franklin said:
> --In your setup.hint, you need to include "gawk fileutils sh-utils"
> in the requirements (these are required by the scripts).
Fixed.
> --Your LPRng src archive is .tgz instead of .tar.bz2, and appears to be
> an uncompressed tar archive.
Your downloader took t
After spending a lot of time putzing around with LPRng, I decided to make
a single package including both server and client components. I rewrote
the postinstall and preremove scripts such that they will not actually
install/start the server daemon. Further, I added instructions in
/usr/doc/Cygwi
After spending a lot of time putzing around with LPRng, I decided to make
a single package including both server and client components. I rewrote
the postinstall and preremove scripts such that they will not actually
install/start the server daemon. Further, I added instructions in
/usr/doc/Cygwi
Pavel Tsekov said:
> Then why not just wait until all the pieces are ready ?
OK, I'll do that. I'll post again when everything is ready.
Joshua Daniel Franklin said:
> --- Brian Gallew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> test: 3.5.10-1
>
> You don't need this.
Since this was a new package and can't be properly tested without
installing the lpd server package (which doesn't exist yet), I thought
Here's the setup.hint file:
# setup.hint for ifhp
sdesc: "print filter for use with LPRng"
ldesc: "A print filter for use with LPRng.
It may, in fact, be used with other lpd software, or even as a standalone
filter, though you will likely have to fight with it to get the
desired effect."
test: 3.5
Joshua Daniel Franklin said:
>> Actually, 2-4 only matter if people want to use LPRng as a server.
>
> Would it be feasible to separate into a simple client package
> (LPRng-client) and a hairier server package (LPRng-server)?
There's a wonderful idea. I'll be posting my setup.hints as soon as
I'
Pavel Tsekov said:
> I think that LPRng was already ported to Cygwin, though not as an
> official package. From what I remember Luke Bakken was the one who
> did the porting. I think that at one point a binary package of
> LPRng for Cygwin was on the ported software page
> (http://cygwin.com/port
I would like to provide an LPRng package. This brings up a couple of
points.
1) What should be done about the lpr.exe provided by cygutils?
2) Should I make LPRng dependent upon ifhp?
3) LPRng really wants to have its own userid to run under. Should I
create one automatically (assuming that's ev
11 matches
Mail list logo
