On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 06:43:25PM -0600, Brian Inglis wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Eric Blake no longer seems to have free time available for Cygwin package
> upgrades, so I would like to offer to co-maintain diffutils and findutils,
> and provide upgrades, as they are both five yea
ner upload as Eric seems
> MIA:
Yes, my time for cygwin has greatly diminished, so you are welcome to
take over wget.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
e 'diff -u' (what git does by default) or 'diff
-c' when generating a patch, so that it has proper context.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
;> This application is not included in any other distro, so i reckon a vote
>>>> must be first passed.
>>>
>>> +1
At any rate, I'm also +1 for inclusion, whether or not you take my
naming suggestion.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
that now wants to
reconstruct what the current locale is. So being able to reconstruct
the names of the thread-local locale via gl_locale_name() makes the
library less coupled to the main app's setup. In particular, at least
gettext wants to use it.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+
work
>> around the bug.
>
> Thanks for letting us know!
Proposed gnulib patch; can be applied to any project that uses gnulib
and wants to avoid the test-localename failure during 'make check'.
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-01/msg00259.html
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+
hich can be used as follows:
locale = newlocale(...);
uselocale(locale);
nl_langinfo_l(NL_LOCALE_NAME(LC_MESSAGES), locale);
to recover the name of the LC_MESSAGES portion of the locale object.
As Cygwin lacks that macro, there is NO way to access the locale name of
what went into constructing a
On 01/18/2017 09:23 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/18/2017 06:12 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> The source code can be found in the file (after unpacking of
>>>> https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libidn/libidn-1.33.tar.gz)
>>>>
>>>>
s/test-localename.c
>>
>> Do you have a self-contained testcase, by any chance?
>
> No, just the testcase from the testsuite in libidn.
The test comes from gnulib, so I'm familiar with ideas on how to try and
whittle it down to a smaller self-contained test. I'll see if I
On 12/16/2016 02:40 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> bash 4.4 now warns about skipping NUL bytes in $(command), since
> command substitution is only well-formed for commands that output
> text, but NUL bytes are not text. Silence the warning by removing
> NUL bytes from the stream before bash
On 12/16/2016 02:40 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> bash 4.4 now warns about skipping NUL bytes in $(command), since
> command substitution is only well-formed for commands that output
> text, but NUL bytes are not text. Silence the warning by removing
> NUL bytes from the stream before bash
bash 4.4 now warns about skipping NUL bytes in $(command), since
command substitution is only well-formed for commands that output
text, but NUL bytes are not text. Silence the warning by removing
NUL bytes from the stream before bash can see them.
---
lib/src_postinst.cygpart | 4 ++--
1 file ch
ing else), where the prev, curr, and test
parameters are optional according to what is desired (if all three are
omitted, push a directive to delete any existing override.hint and fall
back to normal version picking).
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ng like "prev" at all since the version
> number itself is sufficient to specify what's curr and what's old.
Except when upstream version numbers go backwards. We'd have to adopt
something like Fedora's "epoch" numbering if we want our version numbers
to
On 06/07/2016 09:14 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-06-07 08:58, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 06/06/2016 04:23 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>> Eric Blakebashdb
>>
>> I'm still listed as maintainer here? I thought you took over. But yes,
>> s
ent for
>> upset which generates setup.ini), packages marked ARCH=noarch will be
>> uploaded once under the /noarch/release hierarchy instead of into each
>> of /x86/release and /x86_64/release. This change is intended to save
>> disk space and bandwidth for both sourceware and our
y bash-completion and cvsutils are the
most likely candidates, although I haven't yet fully checked if they are
indeed arch-independent.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
m missing something.
Oooh, scary. Yeah, it looks like utter nonsense, as that would indeed
give the PID of bash followed by a literal f, but who wants to look up
info of '1234f'? I wonder if someone writing the script copied
incorrectly from a Makefile?
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
would it be expected to succeed after the first install-info command
> failed?
Sadly, I don't know install-info enough to answer that one.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
he
"or later" clause of all linked-in v2 code), whether or not the
individual source files still state v2+.
>
> I could be wrong, in which case this is another argument against GPLv3. The
> thing is viral even to past versions of itself.
>
> FWIW, I’m no zealot. I’ve got GPL’d and LGPL’d code out in the world. I’m
> just pointing out that restrictive licenses (“free,” hah!) bring along a bag
> of problems. GPLv3 adds a bunch more restrictions.
>
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
r of crawling all directories that have a !perl tag
at the trigger point, and adding a !ready to those directories, that
seems simple enough to do. I think upset will just ignore !perl, which
makes it a nice tag to look for manually.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvir
libsigsegv-2.10-2. And if I recompile m4 against
cygwin 2.2.0-0.1 headers, I end up with a 32k stack which also works.
That means that so far, I have not found any problems with your new
smaller stack sizing requirements.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/18/2015 02:11 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 18 12:18, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 07/17/2015 05:22 PM, Eric Blake (cygwin) wrote:
>>> A new release of libsigsegv, 2.10-2, will soon be available for download
>>> from your favorite mirror. On 32-bit cy
On 07/17/2015 05:22 PM, Eric Blake (cygwin) wrote:
> A new release of libsigsegv, 2.10-2, will soon be available for download
> from your favorite mirror. On 32-bit cygwin, this leaves 2.10-1 as
> previous; on 64-bit cygwin, it is a new port of the package, made
> possible for the f
ame-based filtering still assumes
something is executable without checking contents, or that picking a
different name makes it trivially easy to bypass such filters.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ith admin rights, I'm not sure.
Same key for both personal login and package upload is fine. The only
time two keys are needed is if you are granted admin rights as the
'cygwin' user. In that case, package upload and admin login need
different keys, but it is then up to you wh
;m fine letting you take
over perl-Error).
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
needed attributes so far. At any rate,
ignoring extensions until we have both a need and the code for honoring
the extension makes sense, so my question shouldn't stall your patch.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
plush hippo is above and beyond the level of effort
it took :)
[has it really been since 2009 for my last gold star?]
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
h master
> Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
> nothing to commit, working directory clean
git push --tag release_2.870
>
> Git is puzzeling...
Yeah, it's a hefty learning curve. But once you get past that point,
you wonder how you ever survived on CVS.
--
ile in git, you don't need
gitlog-to-changelog. Basically, it is a choice of which of two
alternate methods are easiest for maintaining log history (I'd lean
towards the use of gitlog-to-changelog, although I'm used to both
approaches in different upstream GNU projects).
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
intain them as the git commit
instead of in a file named ChangeLog, so it's less hassle.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ad
time to try it - the difficulties lie more in getting the coreutils
Makefile to target the difference in cygwin naming with .dll instead of
.so and with .exe suffixes to worry about).
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 01/27/2015 03:57 PM, Eric Blake (cygwin) wrote:
> This is a minor rebuild to sort out packaging issues and refresh against
> newer cygwin (no source changes). I have renamed the development
> package from 'readline' to 'libreadline-devel', to match the naming
>
ng my new build to
current too soon). What implications does this have to the
readline->libreadline-devel rename?
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
otal of over 1.3Gib.
>
> Do maintainers have any objections to these being removed?
No complaints from me (and on seeing this email, I manually removed
stale files for packages I maintain, such as dash and diffutils)
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualiz
On 10/10/2014 11:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 10 10:40, Eric Blake wrote:
>> ping
>>
>> On 09/27/2014 10:27 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Assuming this is the right place for this patch - something I noticed
>>> today, when I got an er
ping
On 09/27/2014 10:27 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Assuming this is the right place for this patch - something I noticed
> today, when I got an error message including the word "thelist".
>
>
> 2014-09-27 Eric Blake
>
> * res.rc: Fix mi
Assuming this is the right place for this patch - something I noticed
today, when I got an error message including the word "thelist".
2014-09-27 Eric Blake
* res.rc: Fix missing space.
Index: res.rc
===
RCS
ithout the actual source getting patched on a system where
>> those assumptions aren't true. Looks like different thing to me and
>> giving it a different name surely wouldn't hurt.
> fakesu?
I like this one.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
the remaining
package wrinkle before actually pushing a package, but even though I had
a slight issue in rebuilding the package, I haven't had any problems
using the pre-built binaries.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/13/2014 01:37 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> The packages and setup.hint files are all ready to use and/or upload
>> from http://tastycake.net/~adam/cygwin/. Before I can go ahead and
>> release, I think I need to be added to cygwin-pkg-maint so I can send in
>> an SSH ke
os), I'll
update cygwin-pkg-maint to list you as maintainer and reply back. It
may be this weekend before I actually get the time to spend on it, though.
Thanks again for stepping up and adopting this from me.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/12/2014 02:00 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 02:04 PM, Christian Franke wrote:
>>
>> This one could be uploaded when a hostname-less coreutils is available
>> also for x86 distro:
>>
>> wget -e robots=off -np -nH --cut-dirs=1 -R'index.html*'
aving the 32-bit coreutils in test until you can repost this
package for upload.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04/15/2014 07:27 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 07:20:38PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 10/23/2013 12:46 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> https://sourceware.org/cygwin-apps/package-upload.html
>>
>> Can we get a link to this page li
Name: Eric Blake
Package: m4
BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY
Comment: "4096-bit RSA, converted by eblake@home from OpenSSH"
B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAACAQDahsY06ilBIRHkSiXtTxF01fLt6WSaIOL+hNqPLf
tAGp8bZ3GyExNlQe1zu2PLPAeZ+idfu/JFxk6eQ3Z/uqTZI7U6IWTiJqutJVoagTmr/ucq
On 10/23/2013 12:46 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/cygwin-apps/package-upload.html
Can we get a link to this page listed on the older contribution guide:
cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library h
On 01/15/2014 04:06 AM, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> On 13 January 2014 23:58, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>> On 13 January 2014 21:32, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> That said, while I don't have as much time for cygwin packaging, I
>>> still DO plan on using git on cygwin, so I at le
On 01/11/2014 01:01 PM, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> Our Git package hasn't been updated in a long time. Although its
> maintainer, Eric Blake, has been on the mailing lists, I don't think
> he's done any work in keeping Git up-to-date (including replying to a
> number of re
ecifies this?
SMTP (RFC 2821) recommends that clients not send lines longer than 999
bytes; many mailers obey this by using "!\n" as the continuation
sequence to break long lines into something that fits SMTP.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualizat
On 09/14/2013 10:39 PM, Jari Aalto wrote:
> 2013-09-15 05:34 Eric Blake
> :
> | On 09/11/2013 12:07 PM, Jari Aalto wrote:
> |
> | > wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \
> | >
> http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/pristine-tar/pris
r.bz2 \
> http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/pristine-tar/setup.hint
Jari, can you please chime in on my question about xdelta?
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-09/msg00210.html
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
sign
e can check if some packages are
> orphaned, or if you are just busy.
>
>
> Eric Blake
>
> cppi
> patchutils
> xdelta
cppi is now available, which means I finally have a working 64-bit build
environment; hopefully I can get the others up soon, as well as rebuild
the
of relevance for someone that cares about getting a POSIX
environment and uses Fortran, just not enough to make it the Base
category. Treat it like cygutils-extra, and put it in the Utils category.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t. I guess that means I really need to make some
time to fire up my windows machine and do a new coreutils build. I'll
reply again when I have a package ready to go, so that we can coordinate
uploads (assuming no one else objects to the plan).
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1
ur linkdir is apparently '/'. That's not good here since
> it leads to the leading double slash.
If you can set your linkdir to '///', then no matter what else happens
at least you won't end up trying to access a network path.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat c
Are we all clear to upload now?
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
\
> || (strcmp (Fs_type, "none") == 0\
> && !hasmntopt (Fs_ent, "bind")))
Actually, for any package afflicted by this gnulib bug (coreutils and
findutils have also both hit it), I've been applying this upstream
gnulib patch:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.gi
which contains
> your packages built by someone else?
Yes.
>
> There are probably other considerations that I haven't thought of. Any
> insights welcome.
>
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
these changes my self but I need feed
> back and permission from the community.
Go for it - this is open source, so you can make the changes for your
own use even if the community doesn't like them.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://l
On 09/20/2012 08:26 AM, SPC wrote:
> Hello again and sorry (Jari mostly) for a previous message with a
> wrong subject. I'll repeat.
Still the wrong list.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Descripti
n't even be bothered to change the
subject line. And your question is more appropriate for the main cygwin
list, as it has nothing to do with packaging an application for
distribution as part of the cygwin project.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualizat
ned upstream and has never been
> updated to Java 5.
Seconded, as the guy who orphaned it upstream when Java 5 came out.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
since I know that newlib recently enabled
a git mirror. And there's ways of using git as your frontend to a CVS
(or svn) repository.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/17/2012 12:18 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> And another one:
>
> cd TeX/texlive
> sed -i -e 's/libpoppler19/libpoppler26/' setup.hint
Done.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Descri
On 05/29/2012 02:58 PM, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 29.05.2012 17:37, schrieb Eric Blake:
>> Upstream coreutils is considering completely dropping su, in favor of
>> having util-linux provide su across all GNU/Linux distros. Right now,
>> cygwin's su.exe comes from co
ve. Is it better to completely drop su from cygwin, or should
I coordinate with the util-linux maintainer to hand control of su out of
coreutils and over to util-linux?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
D
ernatives
>
> I created an empty package and moved the category to "_obsolete".
Jari, please send an announcement mail declaring that the package is
obsolete.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/09/2012 11:27 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 02:12 -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> On 2/6/2012 11:49 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> I've uploaded coreutils-8.15-1 as a test release; I can kick it over to
>>> current once you've got a cygu
On 02/05/2012 01:53 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 1/30/2012 7:01 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently
>>> offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutil
On 01/30/2012 05:01 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently
>> offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutils package with
>> realpath included, and wait to u
kage with
realpath included, and wait to upload it until we can coordinate a build
with cygutils dropping the weaker variant? Or do we want to keep the
cygutils variant for a while longer?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ls has a bigger up-front cost for the person doing the repacking,
but provides a more efficient and instant downstream effect. That, and
repacking seems fairly easy to automate. I'm now 75-25 in favor of
cgf's proposed approach of repacking things and leaving setup.exe alone.
--
Eric
'm wondering if what you did in your patch shouldn't be just the
> default behaviour. No -e option.
+1 to doing this by default, with no option.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s a void for
interaction with existing cygwin apps.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
ds-up.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
I64x size 0x%08lx\n",
> +#endif
Do we need the #ifdef, or can we get away with including
and doing:
printf ("%-47s base 0x%08" PRIx64 " size 0x%08lx\n")
and let PRIx64 take care of the ll vs. I64 spelling?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt
he
> use of strcmp() to compare names?
strcmp is immune to locale effects (only strcoll cares about locale,
with the two functions being equal in the C locale).
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rflow_context_t to void * for applications?
> THus we can drop the unfortunate inclusion of windows.h and not clutter
> the POSIX namespace with Windows definitions.
That's what I argued when I wrote the patch a year ago April. Also, my
patch is available at http://repo.or.cz/w/libsigseg
sly reported, and no action after 2 months :(
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-02/msg00463.html
Adding cygwin-apps in cc to see if the maintainer is even listening.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Descript
> since these errors are unreported (see comment in io_stream::copy), we just
> stop expanding the archive, leaving an incomplete glxext.h
Would returning -EIO be better, since a negative value is a key that
something went wrong besides normal end of file?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.co
art of cygwin. 'cygcheck -p dos2unix' shows that
it is part of cygutils, so I see no reason to repackage it as an
alternative build.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
't seem to source ~/.bashrc.
>
> One related question: if SYS_BASHRC were enabled, would SSH_SOURCE_BASHRC try
> to source /etc/bash.bashrc or ~/.bashrc? The coment in config-top.h only
> mentions the latter. (This is just curiosity)
I'd have to read the source code to sa
t; potentially cause their contents to get downloaded again.
Can't we also patch things to look for a trailing %2f, and perform a
rename() to strip it, so as to avoid the manual cleanup?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
27;m arguing that it is NOT a build requirement for
libtool, it means we need a previous distro link or the full 5 votes.
We're at 2 now; anyone else want to chime in?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
.m4
(such as coreutils and m4), but they include it in the tarball rather
than expecting it to be pre-installed the way libtool 2.4 appears to be
doing things.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
into cygwin proper, is it
time to obsolete sunrpc? On the other hand, libvirt wants to #include
, which only sunrpc provides; is it time to provide that
header as part of base cygwin?
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-August/msg00375.html
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1
hat would probably generate
> some confusion.
My only worry now is if any mirrors will have a stale checksum that
doesn't correspond to the new tarball. But I'm convinced that it's
worth trying the silent upgrade, now.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Lib
omparable to yum's presto mode that makes delta downloading easier for
simple things like adding an x bit.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/25/2010 10:58 PM, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> I agree that "Partial" needs renaming but I don't think "Changing" is
>> clearer.
>>
>> How about "Updating"?
>
> "Changes"? "Modified"?
"Pending&qu
asonable? I would like to add the transition date
> to my release announcement.
Is there a quick list of all packages that depend on python?
I know asciidoc is affected, and I'm working on repackaging it soon, but
I'm not sure if any of my other packages might be affected.
gt; Having a maintainer: tag in setup.hint -- even if upset/genini just
> ignore it -- would make that a lot easier.
Most of my setup.hints have a strategic comment, for that reason:
#maintainer: ...
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvir
I just noticed a broken dependency for less. I've updated the
setup.hint for less to call out libncurses10, instead of libncurses9.
You'll need to do the same in your local copy.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://l
rather than on the packager. For good or
bad, it's certainly less time-consuming as a moderator to hit approve
than it is to do research.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gt;> GTG for me
>
> Thanks to both of you. Please upload, Eric.
Uploaded. Where is the maintainer list located, so I can update that?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ent
indentation style, and to validate that indentation is correct."
category: Devel
requires: libgcc1 libintl8
#maintainer: Eric Blake
Just accepted into stable Fedora 12 this week:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570627#c15
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-
On 03/12/2010 09:14 AM, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> Should I also delete 4.1-6 and 4.1-7?
>
> Yes, those were for cygwin 1.5
Done.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
src.tar.bz2
Done. I also edited your setup.hint to drop the requires: cygwin, as
that is now automatic.
Should I also delete 4.1-6 and 4.1-7?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
According to Frank Seelisch on 3/1/2010 8:32 AM:
> Please upload the following package updates for singular:
>
...
>
> Please keep the following versions as previous (same order as above):
Done.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization
1 - 100 of 543 matches
Mail list logo