Well baby, here's a pacifier.
Suck it.
Harold
> -Original Message-
> From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 6:17 PM
> To: Harold L Hunt II
> Subject: Re: ITP: profile
>
>
> Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> >
> > I forgot. Earnie is always right.
> >
> >
Chuck,
I just fixed the WindowMaker setup.hint. I couldn't figure out what was
where when I made the dependency, so I just picked the cleanest looking name
:) Thanks for pointing this out.
Harold
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of C
Peter,
Chris Faylor had said that apps that run under X need to go in the XFree86
directory... but I'm not sure if that means that it should be stuffed into
the XFree86 category as well:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-04/msg00538.html
Does x3270 only have an X component or does it run i
I've created Cygwin setup.exe packages for the X11 window managers
WindowMaker and Openbox. I have tentatively put them in
release/XFree86/WindowMaker and release/XFree86/openbox... is that a good
idea? Or, should I give each X package a toplevel directory in release/?
Harold
Chris,
> Btw, the new version of 'upset' does the right thing with things
> like this.
> If you have a directory called 'XFree86-fonts-100dpi' it will no longer
> assume that 100dpi is part of the version string. It just uses
> the directory
> name as a prefix for the .tar.bz2 files.
That's goo
iday, April 19, 2002 1:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available
> for comments and testing
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:52:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:24:48AM
Chris,
> Shall we add this to the cygwin distro or are we still waiting for
> some postinstall shell script work?
These will forever be known as Harold's Famous Last Words:
Sure Chris, why not? Go ahead and add the packages to the distro.
Be aware, I just updated XFree86-xserv to 4.2.0
comments and testing
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:18:19AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> >> The syntax for upset should just be "upset dir" where `dir' is the
> >> directory containing the distribution. setup.ini will go to stdout.
> >>
> >>
I just updated the packages at
ftp://huntharo-4.user.msu.edu/pub/cygwin/
to have a working dependency between XFree86-base and the base XFree86
packages, such as XFree86-xserv, XFree86-fnts, etc.
There were two changes required:
1) 'touch contrib/XFree86/XFree86-base/XFree86-base-4.2.0-1.tar.bz
> The syntax for upset should just be "upset dir" where `dir' is the
> directory containing the distribution. setup.ini will go to stdout.
>
> upset -u setup.ini dir
>
> will update an existing setup.ini.
I beg to differ. From my "packages" directory that contains contrib,
release, etc. I hav
> Looks like you figured out upset. Sorry about not responding.
Actually, I did the same thing that Ian did and reverted to the upset from:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/src
in the directory:
winsup/cinstall/temp
That version of upset reports the version number as the whole file name
before the .tar.
I have setup an anonymous ftp site with preliminary Cygwin/XFree86 setup.exe
packages:
ftp://huntharo-4.user.msu.edu/pub/cygwin/
These is based entirely off of Ian Burrell's work.
My primary concerns that I don't know how to resolve are:
1) I didn't do the XFree86-base "meta" package properly.
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harold Hunt
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:43 PM
> To: Charles Wilson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: xfree packages
>
>
> Charles,
>
> Don't bother... I'm already on it. The scripts are modified an
Charles,
Don't bother... I'm already on it. The scripts are modified and I'm just
working on packaging it up.
Harold
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Wilson
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ian Burrell
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:38 PM
> To: Harold Hunt
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: xfree packages
>
>
> Harold Hunt wrote:
> > Yes, we try to keep things regularized around here, so
al Message-
> From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:58 AM
> To: Harold Hunt
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: xfree packages
>
>
> Let's be real picky:
>
> XFree86-xserv-major.minor-portrele
Yes, we try to keep things regularized around here, so XFree86 is the way
that the package names need to be spelled.
Also, I request that you keep the XFree86-xserv package, as that will allow
us to realize the immediate benefit of being able to release the Test-**
server or updates to the stable
17 matches
Mail list logo
