On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 08:15:59AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > > After much deliberation, I have decide to put my packages up for
> > > adoption. I have not had enough free time to properly maintain my
> > > packages for quite some time. Unfortunately, this is not going to
> > > change for th
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:03:34AM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> Python 3.2 is no longer supported upstream, and many packages now
> require newer versions. Any idea on a timeframe for a coordinated
> upgrade to 3.4.2?
After much deliberation, I have decide to put my packages up for
adoption.
en the rather short list of affected
> > > maintainers:
> > >
> > > octave Marco Atzeri
> > > perl Reini Urban/Achim Gratz ?!?
> > > php Yaakov Selkowitz
> > > python Jason Tishler/Yaakov Selkowitz
> > > R
Yaakov,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:42:02PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2014-06-30 19:57, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:38:35AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >>On 2014-06-24 09:42, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >>>A security vulnerab
Yaakov,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:38:35AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2014-06-24 09:42, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >A security vulnerability (CVE-2014-4616) has been announced in python
> >and python3 builtin _json modules. Patches have been committed
> >upstream; could we get the latest
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:29:25AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> And then there is python. Jason, are you set up to build 64 bit
> packages yet?
Yes.
Jason
Yaakov,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:30:28PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> As part of the 64bit bootstrap process, I packaged python3, but had
> to configure it --without-threads due to a runtime error. However,
> I am finding now that this is not a regularly used configuration;
> several major
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:45:22PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
No.
> 2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
Yes, but I need to purchase it and schedule converting one of PCs from
32- to 64-bit Windows.
> 3) Are you willing to
Corinna,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 06:23:11PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 13 10:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Below is an entirely new patch. Not only that the cyg64 prefix got
> dropped, but only With these changes rebase builds fine on
> x86_64-pc-cygwin. There are a few problems rel
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:01:52PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 12 04:19, Yaakov wrote:
> > Then the conf.d could be in addition to my patch, in which case my
> > patch is just avoiding the need for the packages in question to
> > state that which we already know.
>
> I'm ok with that,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:17:50PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 11 03:40, Yaakov wrote:
> > The following patchset is an attempt to merge perlrebase/rubyrebase/etc.
> > into rebaseall, for reasons I previously discussed last month:
>
> The patches look good to me. Jason, what do you t
Yaakov,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:30:19AM -0600, Yaakov wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:56:56 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> > Jason Tishler announced last month[1] that he intends to upgrade
> > Python to 2.7 on 01 February, which is quickly approaching.
>
> Jason
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 06:56:56PM -0600, Yaakov wrote:
> Jason Tishler announced last month[1] that he intends to upgrade
> Python to 2.7 on 01 February, which is quickly approaching.
>
> If anybody needs them, my Python-dependent distro packages have been
> rebuilt and are
Corinna,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 01:37:10PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> While looking into Marco's rebase problem I noticed that 64 bit support
> in rebase was not complete. 64 bit uses IMAGE_REL_BASED_DIR64 relocation
> entries, which were simply ignored since only the 32 bit variation
> IM
Yaakov,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:29:18PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2012-07-23 16:17, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >I uploaded the python3 packages to the following:
> >
> > sourceware.org:~jlt63/staging/python3-3.2.3-1
> >
> >Would you mind making a q
Yaakov,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:39:28PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2012-07-18 14:36, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >BTW, to get the _dbm module to build I had to change 3.1-dbm.patch as
> >follows:
> [snip]
> >Additionally, I removed --with-dbmliborder=gdbm from
Yaakov,
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 08:47:47AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2012-06-26 02:51, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 13:18 -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >>I really appreciate your feedback. Can you post your WIP Python 3.2
> >>
Achim,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:31:23PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
> > Will do. Might need a day or two.
>
> I decided to do it right now. The patch stack against CVS is
> attached. The change to build.sh is unchanged since I don't
> understand what or how Jason wants it
Sorry for the delay, but I was AFK...
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 08:29:25PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > Not speaking for all, just for me, I like the idea to make the
> > switch a simple switch without argument.
I like this idea too. One benefit of this new functionalit
Yaakov,
I really appreciate your feedback. Can you post your WIP Python 3.2
cygport script and patches? See below for my comments.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:59:42AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2012-06-14 13:56, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >See attached for a diff between you
Yaakov,
See attached for a diff between your python3-3.1.5rc1-1 cygport script
and my WIP 3.2 one. I'm still deciding on which patches to include
and/or getting them to apply cleanly, so ignore those diffs for now.
I'm most interested in your feedback on my changes to src_install(), so
please foc
Yaakov,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 03:02:24PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2012-04-17 13:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >On 2012-04-17 09:06, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >>Yaakov,
> >>
> >>On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>
Corinna,
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 12:02:51PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Jason, ping?
Did we reach consensus on the approach to resolve the bug found by Achim
Gratz?
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-05/msg00027.html
Are we going with the sed -r or escaping the question mark option?
Tha
Corinna,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:49:18PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 30 08:08, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 02:10:57PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Jason, Ping?
> >
> > I will release an updated rebase as soon as I can find
Vladimir,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:40:50PM +0300, Vladimir Shatilo wrote:
> In the latest cygwin package fetchmail 6.3.18-1 has been compiled with
> old openssl 0.9.8 library. This causes errors in ssl certificate
> validation when connecting to imap or pop3 with ssl. The problem is
> openssl
Corinna,
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 02:10:57PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Jason, Ping?
I will release an updated rebase as soon as I can find some free time.
Thanks,
Jason
Yaakov,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:07:43PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> Security vulnerabilities have been announced in Python (CVE-2011-3389,
> CVE-2012-0845, CVE-2012-0876, CVE-2012-1150) and are fixed in 2.6.8.
I will release 2.6.8 as soon as I can.
> After that, do you have plans for 2.
Corinna,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 06:15:59PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Jason? Ping?
>
> On Mar 19 18:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Mar 19 12:59, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:57:41AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > >
Corinna,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:57:41AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Jason? Ping?
I looked through the patch and it seems OK. ATM, that's the best I can
do. Let me know when to release a new package.
Thanks,
Jason
proceed with the necessary announcements. Also:
> >
> >[snip]
>
> Thanks very much to all involved in this transition!
>
> Of course, special thanks to Yaakov for coordinating this.
Ditto!
> And, also, special thanks to Jason Tishler who managed to fit this
> effort into his c
Yaakov,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:57:57AM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> Idle is a good example of a Tkinter app. If you followed my upgrade
> instructions, including my patch, and idle is working properly, then
> it should be just fine.
idle seems to work.
I have uploaded python-2.6.7-1 bu
Yaakov,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:57:56AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> I'm not a python-tkinter user. Any hints on how to test?
I successfully ran the two examples from the following:
http://www.pythonware.com/library/tkinter/introduction/
Specifically, the following:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 02:58:19PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:51:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 02:29:00PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >Is there any chance that we could get some traction from the
> >
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:51:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 02:29:00PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >Is there any chance that we could get some traction from the remaining
> >holdouts for the tcl/tk upgrade? I'm primarily concerned about not
> >breaking pyth
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:12:35AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > > What's the supported way in a postinstall script to find the Cygwin
> > > installation directory? I thought of 'cat
> > > /proc/registry/HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Cygwin/something-or-other', but
> > > it seems that there can b
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:23:15PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> [Moved to cygwin-apps for discussion]
>
> On Jan 20 09:49, marco atzeri wrote:
> > As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and
> > we are always suggesting it to anyone with fork problem,
> > I think a simple batch file in the /
Yaakov,
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 09:47:05PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> Still outstanding are:
> > * python[-tkinter] (Jason Tishler)
> > * suite3270 [tcl3270] (Peter A. Castro)
>
> In order to provide a seamless transition for users, your packages
> must be rebuil
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:43:04AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:31:56AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Since tags are global to the entire CVS repository, should I prepend
> >the tag with "rebase" to guarantee uniqueness?
>
> Yes, please.
Will do.
Thanks,
Jason
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 06:21:30PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 9/23/2011 11:11 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Additionally, are there any conventions I should following when I tag
> > the release?
>
> "." is not allowed in cvs tags, and they are not allowed t
Chuck,
Corinna,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:37:09AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 9/20/2011 11:24 AM, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >> After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late
> >
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late
> July/early August, any chance you could bump the version and roll a
> new release?
Yes. Should the next version be 4.0 or 3.1? I recommend the former,
since there
Corinna,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:36:17PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 21 08:14, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:03:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > > Corinna's patch is fine; we're just waiting for Jason's ok -- then
> &g
Corinna,
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:03:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Corinna's patch is fine; we're just waiting for Jason's ok -- then I
> can add whatever gloss is needed to fixup on mingw/msys. (FYI, I'm
> coming up on some travel soon so may be AFK...)
Due to being AFK myself and the si
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:08:10AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Another ping.
>
> Where are you, guys? I'm getting concerned.
Sorry, but I was AFK and then catching up...
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 87
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:26:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 21 22:49, JonY wrote:
> > On 6/21/2011 23:05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Here's a simple one.
> > >
> > > Avoid error messages due to trying to rebase 64 bit images (as long as
> > > we can't handle them). This has been
Corinna,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:33:12PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Any ideas on how to resolve this issue?
>
> It's part of the repository. It should be sufficent to do this:
>
> $ rm -rf build-aux
> $ cvs up -d
I forgot about the "-d" option. I guess my conversion to svn is
co
Chuck,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:06:59PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> I've committed all of my changes, ...
When I run autoreconf, build-aux is created, but it's empty:
$ autoreconf -fvi
autoreconf-2.65: Entering directory `.'
autoreconf-2.65: configure.ac: not using Gettext
autoreconf-2.65:
Corinna,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:25:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Ok to apply?
Yes.
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
Corinna,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:18:35PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Jason, this patch still applies cleanly. Is it ok to apply?
Yes, it's OK by me. However, Chuck is the author of peflags.
Chuck,
OK to apply?
Thanks,
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or
Corinna,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:25:59PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Ok to apply?
I would like to give Chuck a chance to apply the following patch that he
had already submitted (so it applies cleanly):
* autoconfify rebase and imagehelper
* make peflagsall and rebaseall set PATH to
(
Corinna,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:34:58AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> it looks like the rebase package is not under CVS control. Would you
> mind if we set up a new rebase project in the Cygwin application CVS
> repository?
Not at all. What are the mechanics? Who will do the actual CVS
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 01:34:04PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 07:30:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >I didn't get any moderator email either so far. Maybe the mailing
> >list server has just some hiccup...
>
> Sorta. The email was blocked because it containe
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:57:52PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 30 12:56, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:42:12PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Nov 30 01:30, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > > > I have provided Jason Tishler wi
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:42:12PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 30 01:30, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > I have provided Jason Tishler with up to date packages for the
> > current fetchmail 6.3.18 package (with selected upstream fixes from
> > post-6.3.18 Git) a fo
Cary,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 07:17:08AM -0700, Cary R. wrote:
> --- On Wed, 6/23/10, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 08:11:37PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > BTW, ready for python3 yet? ;-)
> >
> > No, not really, bu
Yaakov,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 08:11:37PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 13:42 -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:41:50PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> > > With Jari's packages updated, I think we're close enough t
Yaakov,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:41:50PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 21:09 -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Well, it's more "about" than "on," but I'm ready to release Python
> > 2.6.5-2 and promote it to current.
>
>
Jari,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 04:39:20PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> I'm working on it and it is really puzzling as the 2.5 install works
> just fine, but installing 2.6 gets to the point fo breakage.
>
> Once I get environment set up, it will be fast to upgrade packages.
How did you resolve your
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:51:13PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> Today being 01 June, the due date for Python 2.6:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 09:24:36AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > I will update Cygwin to make 2.6.5-1 (or later) current on or about
> > June 1, 2010.
Well
Jari,
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:26:50AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> After installing 2.6.5-1:
>
> $ python -V
> sh: /usr/bin/python: Permission denied
>
> $ /usr/bin/python2.6.exe -V
> sh: /usr/bin/python2.6.exe: Permission denied
> [snip]
WFM:
$ python -V
Python 2.6.5
$ /usr/bin/
Yaakov,
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:44:27AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> Another patch is required for Python 2.6 to export
> PySignal_SetWakeupFd in the implib, which is a new symbol in 2.6 and
> is used by PyGObject.
>
> Please add this to your 2.6 package before we switch so that
> PyGObje
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 02:13:53PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2010-04-30 13:11, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Would this be a good time to think about transitioning tcl/tk and
> >friends to X (since python<=> idle uses tcl/tk, and you're already
> >talking about a backwards incompatible chang
Eric,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:43:14AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Is there a quick list of all packages that depend on python?
>
> I know asciidoc is affected, and I'm working on repackaging it soon, but
> I'm not sure if any of my other packages might be affected.
I get the following:
$ egrep
Corinna,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:29:31AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Here's another problem, even though it's a small one.
>
> If you don't start ash, but dash, then rebaseall refuses to run with
> the usual message:
>
> rebaseall: only ash processes are allowed during rebasing
>
Corinna,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 04:09:03PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > The following packages should update their setup.hint to refer to
> > dash rather than ash:
> >
> > fetchmail
> > rebase
>
> I changed the setup.hint files on sourceware. Jason, please change
> that in your local fil
Corinna,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:56:02AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I won't update inetutils anymore, except for tiny fixes and packaging
> stuff. Actually I'd rather OBSOLETE it entirely. syslogd is replaced
> by syslog-ng and all other tools in inetutils are security holes all in
> it
Jari,
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:52:27AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> [snip]
>
> sdesc: "Fast, lightweight distributed source control management system"
> ldesc: "Distributed, efficient Python based source control system."
> category: Devel
> requires: cygwin cygpython2.5 python
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:01:56AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> So I added the rebase package to the Base category now.
I updated my copy too.
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:59:18AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 11 15:34, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > The Python extension _ssl.dll currently in the distribution depends
> > on openssl 0.9.7, but the python package has no dependency on the
> > openssl097 package.
>
> I changed python's setup
Corinna,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:18:23AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 17 14:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > and the following packages to the Python group:
> >
> > python
> > subversion-python
> > libxml2-python
>
> I have added the "Perl" and "Python" categories to the above
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 07:59:12AM -0800, James R. Phillips wrote:
> I have put a half-hour of googling into trying to find out how to
> verify or discover the assigned base address of the dll
> (/usr/lib/lapack/cyglapack.dll). No luck. So, I give up. How do you
> discover this information?
Use
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:01:33AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 29 21:14, Reini Urban wrote:
> > For the freegis packages using postgresql: geos is ready, gdal broke
> > recently but I still have an old one, so postgis will be soon out
> > and ITP'd. For mapserver I'd prefer apache-php,
Reini,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:45:45PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
> Signal TERM is correctly handled by postmaster, postmaster running as
> SYSTEM owned service. So --termsig INT is not needed anymore.
AFAICT, SIGTERM was always handled by postmaster.
> I'd prefer TERM over INT: smart shutdow
Reini,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 03:07:05PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
> >To be specific, why doesn't the following (excerpt) from my
> >PostgreSQL 7.x README work for 8.x?
> >
> >$ cygserver-config
> >$ net user postgres $password /add /fullname:postgres
> >/comment:'PostgreSQL user acc
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 11:37:46AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 23 10:30, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> > Reini Urban wrote:
> > >Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
> > >>Reini Urban wrote:
> > >>>Installing as service is quite hard without sysbash,
> > >>>[snip]
> >
> > So it is not possible to run
Reini,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:42:45PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
> postgresql-8.x
>
> jason doing the -7.x tree. I'm still fighting with stupid cyg ipc
> problems, which appear on about 50% of the users. fixes or
> suggestions or maintainership change greatfully accepted.
I'm still hopi
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> So, ALL maintainers of Cygwin packages,
> please reply to this mail within the next six weeks,
> including a list of ALL packages you maintain.
I maintain the following packages:
fetchmail
postgresql (but Reini was suppos
Gerrit,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> >>By the way, is it reliable to use objdump -x to find the base
> >>(ImageBase) ? For cygssl-0.9.8.dll it is 1000, but I thought
> >>the base was 0x6300
> &
Pierre,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:34:27AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for the above. :,(
> > Unfortunately, I have found that the DLLs need a g
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:04:17PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 01:42:34PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >From: "Christopher Faylor"
> >>Do we need to coordinate this among all package maintainers, maybe?
> >>Maybe we could publish a list of all of the dlls in the
Carlo,
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:22:19AM +0800, Carlo Florendo wrote:
> Do we have a maintainer for postgresql?
Yes, Reini Urban agreed to become the Cygwin PostgreSQL maintainer:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-08/msg00188.html
> Curr stays at 7.4.5-1 but the latest release
Corinna,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:12:28PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 18 08:04, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:07:26PM -0400, Bob Heckel wrote:
> > > I have w3m 0.5.1 and libgc 6.4 packaged and available for initial
> > >
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:07:26PM -0400, Bob Heckel wrote:
> I have w3m 0.5.1 and libgc 6.4 packaged and available for initial
> release:
>
> http://bheckel.multics.org/cygwin/w3m/w3m-0.5.1-1.tar.bz2
> http://bheckel.multics.org/cygwin/w3m/w3m-0.5.1-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://bheckel.multics.org/cygw
Bod,
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 10:13:53AM -0500, Bob Heckel wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:17:20 -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > BTW, when did w3m become dependent on the above? I've been using
> > w3m for a long time and never noticed this dependency. However, I
> &g
Bob,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:32:20PM -0500, Bob Heckel wrote:
> Based on suggestions from http://cygwin.com/setup.html, I'm announcing
> my willingness to be the package maintainer for the w3m browser
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/w3m). I haven't found any mention of
> an existing w3m pac
Jason,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 06:41:18PM -0600, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
> I downloaded the source for Corkscrew and it compiled OOTB on Cygwin.
>
> I'd like to see it available as an official package and, since it just
> works, I guess I am also volunteering to maintain it.
As an alternative,
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:15:47PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > Igor, can we get two gold stars for Jason? One for his years of
> > Postgres support, and another one for just being a long time
> > contributor to Cygwin.
> >
> > [snip]
>
> Don
Reini,
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:03:54PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
> I've taken over from Jason Tishler with the 8.x series with his
> permission. Thanks Jason!
You are very welcome. Actually, I should be thanking *you*! :,)
Thanks,
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishle
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:41:29AM -0800, Ross Smith II wrote:
> I want to contribute/maintain cdrtools (cdrecord, mkisofs, etc).
+1.
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
Reini,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 06:59:24PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
> Jason Tishler schrieb:
> >On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:09:26PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
> >>ok, postgresql-7.4.5-1 is ready.
> >
> >Thanks, but I'm going to upload a postgresql-7.
.tar.bz2 and the build and patch file.
>
> I'll to change that with the 8.0.0beta1 package.
The above is fine -- just call me old fashioned... :,)
> Jason Tishler schrieb:
> >Hmm... What does cygcheck indicate?
>
> The problem was this autoconf line (configure.in):
> AC
Bertrand,
Wrong list, I'm redirecting to the correct one...
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 04:16:07PM +0200, bertrand marquis wrote:
> i'm using pydoc to generate informations out of python source.
> But sometimes i've got this error:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pydoc", li
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:41:03PM -0400, Robb, Sam wrote:
> > It was actually right there on the xargs man page... ;-) Ok, so
> > it's settled -- I'll change your patch to do that instead of the
> > -exec option.
>
> Just curious - is there a reason to prefer xargs vs. -exec? I know
> that xarg
Arno,
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:56:18PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:33:04AM +0100, Arno Waschk wrote:
> > Is there a way using the existing python package together with the
> > shipped libdb4.1? Do I need to compile my own python?
>
> At the
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 26 21:58, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > Nevertheless, I will try to release a PostgreSQL package built
> > against cygserver as soon as possible.
>
> That would be nice, thank you.
I tried over the week
Corinna,
Sorry for the delay, but I was on vacation.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 03:58:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> can we expect a new postgresql package soon, which uses the IPC
> functions from cygserver instead of cygipc?
I'm also starting a new job on Monday, so my free time will be ev
Arno,
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:33:04AM +0100, Arno Waschk wrote:
> Is there a way using the existing python package together with the
> shipped libdb4.1? Do I need to compile my own python?
At the moment, yes.
> Shouldn't one expect the official python package to be an up-to-date
> libdb link
Corinna,
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 10:08:26AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> I have some good news to report. First, PostgreSQL builds OOTB
> against cygserver without *any* source changes. Second, PostgreSQL
> appears to work just fine when used casually.
>
> Unfortunat
Corinna,
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:46:18AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 3 10:08, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > I am using cygwin-inst-20031231.tar.bz2 with cygserver from the latest
> > CVS as my test environment.
>
> Would you mind to try with the snapshot from 12
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 01:54:43PM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> I would like to contribute and maintain the LDAP libraries and clients
> from the openldap package.
I vote pro.
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
