On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Greetings venerable maintainers,
I have two questions:
- Does anybody know of a simple way to find out which packages in the 32
bit distro are actually noarch' packages? The reason I'm asking is
that I'm looking for a simple way
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de wrote:
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/ppl
http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/cloog-ppl
I'm looking at ppl right now. Is there any
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Hi!
Obviously I can't force you to switch to cygport.
Why not? Honestly, can't you just make it a cygwin policy?
We're still mulling over setting up a build machine. If we have that,
and if you
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com wrote:
On Mar 22 19:11, marco atzeri wrote:
latest libstdc++6-4.8-20130319-1
has at least a missing entry point from previous dll
cmake fails with
_ZTVN10_cxxabiv117_class_type_infoE could not be located
Yaakov
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Chris Sutcliffe ir0nh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 March 2013 13:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
You certainly could but that would mean that you'd be releasing untested
software for 64-bit. Is that something that we want to endorse or should
we have some way of
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Cary R. wrote:
From: NightStrike
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: Maintainers please weigh in on 64-bit Cygwin
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
On 17 March 2013 13:45, Christopher
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Yaakov
yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:59:20 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 27 21:29, JonY wrote:
I'm worried that I might break gcc installs if I overlooked something
obvious.
The upload will be overwriting the
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, JonY 10wa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/19/2013 20:53, JonY wrote:
On 2/19/2013 19:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:56 +0800, JonY wrote:
I can give Cygwin GCC a try over the weekends. Not sure if it is too
complicated.
Well, if someone else
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
Yes
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
Also, SF.net's FRS is notorious for serving up the wrong file when more
than one file the same name in different directories (e.g. setup.hint).
That has long since been fixed.
You may wish to find another location for temporary posting of
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Jon TURNEY jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk wrote:
WFM. Once your _PROTECT_BOOL_MACRO patch for windef.h is accepted, I
can roll an xproto update and this will be GTG.
No problems with ddraw.h status?
There's probably some decruftification which can take place
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:34 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Here's the part from mingw-w64 windef.h:
#ifndef _DEF_WINBOOL_
#define _DEF_WINBOOL_
typedef int WINBOOL;
#pragma push_macro(BOOL)
#undef BOOL
#if !defined(__OBJC__) !defined(__OBJC_BOOL)
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Charles Wilson
cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
Well, the 64bit build of w32api provides over 2000 import libraries. The
32bit build has only about 225. Apparently this is because the .def
files that each are generated from are maintained separately, vetted on
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Dave Korn dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com wrote:
GCC 4.5.x branch and the 4.6.x branch ABI changed for win64, I'm trying
to avoid breaking user's self-built packages, so 4.5.0 and earlier is
out of the question. The current 4.3.4 is too old for mingw-w64.
Going
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 11:16:54AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:33 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Here's my question, though: given the incompatibilities mentioned,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Charles Wilson
cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
On 7/7/2010 5:03 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 09:44:14PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 7 July 2010 18:27, NightStrike wrote:
How's it built now?
With Cygwin gcc and the -mno-cygwin
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Andy Koppe andy.ko...@gmail.com wrote:
PERHAPS it makes the most sense to provide two single-target compilers
(but most of the interop issues would remain; the only simplification
would be the elimination of any packages that are explicitly
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Andy Koppe andy.ko...@gmail.com wrote:
Is mingw64 already part of a major Linux distribution? Otherwise it
needs five votes from Cygwin maintainers.
Ubuntu, Debian, and Fedora.
Also, are you sure that gcc-4.6 is sufficiently stable for release,
i.e. that there
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Charles Wilson
cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
Hmm. So, big picture, we have possibly three different mingw-ish compilers,
and you're currently attempting to shepherd the first one, while being
mindful of future issues related to simultaneous installation of
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Charles Wilson
cyg...@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
On 6/30/2010 2:53 PM, NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
Hmm. So, big picture, we have possibly three different mingw-ish
compilers,
and you're currently attempting
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:27 PM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Sourceforge doesn't have an FTP, it makes things a bit hard, I'll try to get
an FTP server soon. Basically, its everything under:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/
Is FTP
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com wrote:
So, follow-on question: Can we have one toolchain which targets both
32-bit and 64-bit? It is certainly possible to do that on linux with
a -m32 and -m64 option. Is it possible to do this
22 matches
Mail list logo
