Re: please update libXML

--- "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can you please give a clue how to compile the shared libraries? > > I use this script to relibtoolize (attached). > Just run it once *after* applying the little patch (works for both, > libxml2 and libxslt). Thanks, Gerrit! I'll try this o

RE: please update libXML

--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gerrit. > I plan to wait for Gnome2 to get to at least rc2 before updating > libXML. The releases have been fast and furious while they finalise > everything. But now we can't even easily build the libraries from sources, because of the

Re: Proprietary Software [WAS: Re: SGML/XML packages available for testing]

--- Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: > > > > Hi Markus, > > > > I am using these distributions in my propriatory software: > > > > Your proprietary software will need to have a GPL license if it uses any >

Re: SGML/XML packages available for testing

Hi Markus, I am using these distributions in my propriatory software: > docbook-xml > docbook-xsl also I use Gnome.org's libxslt for processing the docbook files. Please let us know in which directories you put these files. There's no "standard" path for them, so let's define it clearly. R

RE: setup.exe gui testing

--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that is a fine goal, but I don't see why that means removing > functionality from the gui. once I've started dreaming, what about another pretty thing -- Jumpstart? A text file describing all setup options and packages, so that you easily

RE: setup.exe gui testing

--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that is a fine goal, but I don't see why that means removing > functionality from the gui. ok, then I see the difficulty with the current setup layout. Maybe then it's worth refusing from step-by-step windows, but instead one Explorer-lik

RE: setup.exe gui testing

--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's supposed to let folk - like me - who want to madly change revision > levels, be able to do so. But why do you want this in the graphical setup utility? Isn't it better to have a command-line (for cmd.exe, cygwin dll-independent) setup utility,

Re: setup.exe gui testing

Sorry, I've read Robert's posting again and realised that my prevoius postig was a bit offtopic. But still the problems remain, and might be the clue why some other window management or graphics prpgrams had problems with it. Stan --- Stanislav Sinyagin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: setup.exe gui testing

I dunno if it's the old behaviour, when setup window is covered by another window, and you click the icon on the taskbar, cygwin setup window does not come to top. Also, in older versions, when FTP idle timeout occurs (in case if I thoroughly look through the packages and it takes few more mi

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

> > FWIW, I keep mentioning that the script that I use to generate packages > is available via CVS on sources.redhat.com: > > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps co mknetrel > > mkdir -p /netrel/{src,inst,build,upload,extra} > cd /netrel/src > gtar xzf whatever-1.9.tar.gz >

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

> Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup > a cross-compile environment, and then downloads and does > > something like > >cygmkpkg expat-1.95.2.tar.gz > this for any number of `native' packages > > See > http://lilypond.org/cygwin/cygwin-cross.tar.gz The

Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please keep replies on-list. sorry, sometimes mail comes with the list address in From:, but not this time... > > And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good > or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a fe

Re: ttcp package ready

> Sorry, but I found one file called cygwin-ttcp.tar > by pure luck > on your page. It's not correctly named and it > consists entirely > of the sources, AFAICS. I tried to simplify your downloading efforts. Inside that TAR, there are all required files: setup.hint ttcp-19980512-1-src.tar.bz2 t

ttcp package ready

Hi all, The voting results regarding my package (TTCP) are the following: one voted positive, one has not decided, none objected. Please allow me to maintain it. All the 3 files are TARed and accessible from http://briefcase.yahoo.com/ssinyagin I can send the attachment of you like. The co

Re: ttcp package ready

On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:22:04 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Has this been discussed here before? I don't see it mentioned in any of > my archived messages. Do you have a URL for this tool? I would like to > see a little more of a description before I offer my vote on the > subject. At

ttcp package ready

Hi all, I've created the Cygwin package for ttcp, after fixing a minor compatibility bug in it. The sources were taken from Terry Slattery's distribution at www.netcordia.com The setup.hint file follows: category: Net requires: cygwin sdesc:"Popular network benchmarking tool" ldesc:"