RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages with dependencies

2002-04-18 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:16 AM > To: Robert Collins > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages > with dependencies > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 05:55

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Cygwin/XFree86 setup.exe packages with dependencies

2002-04-18 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:30 PM > > Dependencies work for installing. The behavior I noticed > when uninstalling is that dependencies are ignored. I'm > guessing that setup.exe was designed that way because

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages with dependencies

2002-04-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:30:22AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: >2) upset took the list of requirements from XFree86-base/setup.hint and put >them in quotes ("cygwin ...") when it created setup.ini. upset didn't do >this for any other packages and the Cygwin setup.ini doesn't have quotes >around dep

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Cygwin/XFree86 setup.exe packages with dependencies

2002-04-17 Thread Harold Hunt
I just updated the packages at ftp://huntharo-4.user.msu.edu/pub/cygwin/ to have a working dependency between XFree86-base and the base XFree86 packages, such as XFree86-xserv, XFree86-fnts, etc. There were two changes required: 1) 'touch contrib/XFree86/XFree86-base/XFree86-base-4.2.0-1.tar.bz