On Apr 27 12:47, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>
> >Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
> >From: Peter A. Castro
> >Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
>
> Ugh...resending since I forgot to remov
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peter A. Castro
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Ugh...resending since I forgot to remove the email addresses from the
quoted header and expect that email to be bounce, but
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peter A. Castro
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
From
On Apr 24 07:40, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>
> >Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
> >From: Peter A. Castro Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from
> >distro
> >
> >On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Corinna Vins
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peter A. Castro
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:35:23 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re
On Apr 20, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>
> the machine I had access to disappeared a month ago and I've been scrambling
> to get another one.
VirtualBox and the Windows 10 Technical Preview are free, and they run Cygwin
just fine. :)
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:35:23 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Peter?
It's another two weeks :}
Sorry. it's been a very busy 6 months.
Also, the machine I had access to disappear
18:12:21 +0100
> > > >From: Corinna Vinschen
> > > >Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
> > > >
> > > >Peter?
> > > >
> > > >Ping?
> > >
> > > Oh Carp! I forgot about this! Sorry!! It&#
On Mar 19 22:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 19 13:19, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > >Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:12:21 +0100
> > >From: Corinna Vinschen
> > >Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping
On Mar 19 13:19, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> >Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:12:21 +0100
> >From: Corinna Vinschen
> >Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
> >
> >Peter?
> >
> >Ping?
&g
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:12:21 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Peter?
Ping?
Oh Carp! I forgot about this! Sorry!! It's been a very busy two months
for me. I'll see if I can c
Peter?
Ping?
On Feb 2 10:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 31 13:32, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > >Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:43:44 +0100
> > >From: Corinna Vinschen
> > >Subject: Re: [H
On 2/3/2015 4:17 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 2 10:46, Ken Brown wrote:
I've now begun working on the 64-bit build. I found a few minor things I
had to change, and the build was pretty far along, when I apparently hit a
gcc bug:
[...]
Oh, that's too bad. I hope somebody from the gcc f
On Feb 2 10:46, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 1/30/2015 11:40 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> >On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
> I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
> order to
On 1/30/2015 11:40 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
order to make the build succeed. I also had to use libdb4.5 in
On Jan 31 13:32, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> >Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:43:44 +0100
> >From: Corinna Vinschen
> >Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
> >
> >
> >Just a quick update on the
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:43:44 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Just a quick update on the libopenssl098 frontier:
On Jan 14 15:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
it's really *really* overd
On 1/30/2015 2:02 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 11:40 -0500, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
orde
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 11:40 -0500, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> > On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>> I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
> >>> order to make the build succeed.
On 1/30/2015 8:25 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm attaching the patches that I applied (on top of Reini's patches) in
order to make the build succeed. I also had to use libdb4.5 instead of
libdb4.8.
Is that ok? I mean,
On 1/30/2015 4:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/23/2015 8:48 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
My guess is correct. lisp.exe uses bit 31 (counting from the LSB) as a marker
during garbage collection, and this is incompatible with Cygwin's use of high
memory for
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> I just had a look and it turned out that the 64 bit release only has
> a single db version, 5.3, while the 32 bit version comes with 4.5 and
> 4.8 only. Volker???
5.3 for 64 bit was compiled by Yaakov I think, when I was absent.
xemacs and db are the
Hi Ken,
On Jan 29 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 1/23/2015 8:48 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> >My guess is correct. lisp.exe uses bit 31 (counting from the LSB) as a
> >marker
> >during garbage collection, and this is incompatible with Cygwin's use of high
> >memory for the heap. I think I know how to f
On 1/23/2015 8:48 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
My guess is correct. lisp.exe uses bit 31 (counting from the LSB) as a marker
during garbage collection, and this is incompatible with Cygwin's use of high
memory for the heap. I think I know how to fix this (by defining
LINUX_NOEXEC_HEAPCODES in the Cygwi
Just a quick update on the libopenssl098 frontier:
On Jan 14 15:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
> the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
>
> The problem is that we still have packages requiring libope
On 01/14/2015 03:19 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 1/14/2015 12:46 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen writes:
Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as
well
(temporary file generation) that also affect Maxima from ports.
>>>
>>> If it's a problem with the
Dear Volker, Ken and Corinna,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>> Ken Brown writes:
>
> > On 1/23/2015 5:57 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> >> gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -Wimplicit-function-declaration
> -fdebug-prefix-map=/cygdrive/d/misc/src/release/xemacs-21.4.22-2
On Jan 23 17:43, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 1/23/2015 3:09 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Hi Ken,
> >
> >On Jan 23 08:48, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>[...]
> >>My guess is correct. lisp.exe uses bit 31 (counting from the LSB) as a
> >>marker during garbage collection, and this is incompatible with Cygwin's us
On Jan 23 15:45, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>
> > I, for one, welcome our new clisp overlord!
>
> ALL HAIL THE CLISP OVERLORD
YMMD,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
pgp9Zl8MXnfxf
On 1/23/2015 3:09 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Ken,
On Jan 23 08:48, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/14/2015 4:19 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
It is. There's a configure option "--ignore-absence-of-libsigsegv". But there
are more serious problems, affecting both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions. (So
even jus
> I, for one, welcome our new clisp overlord!
ALL HAIL THE CLISP OVERLORD
Hi Ken,
On Jan 23 08:48, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 1/14/2015 4:19 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> >It is. There's a configure option "--ignore-absence-of-libsigsegv". But
> >there
> >are more serious problems, affecting both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions.
> >(So
> >even just rebuilding clisp for 32-bit C
On Jan 23 16:43, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > Ken Brown writes:
>
> > On 1/23/2015 5:57 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> >> gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -Wimplicit-function-declaration
> -fdebug-prefix-map=/cygdrive/d/misc/src/release/xemacs-21.4.22-2.i686/build=/usr/src/debug/xemacs-21.4.22-2
>
> Vin Shelton writes:
> Hi, Volker -
> Vin wrote:
>>> I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
> Volker wrote:
>> Here we are
> A few thoughts:
> 1. You need to use the most recent XEmacs sources from mercurial.
OK
> 2. You must
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>> Ken Brown writes:
>
> > On 1/23/2015 5:57 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> >> gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -Wimplicit-function-declaration
> -fdebug-prefix-map=/cygdrive/d/misc/src/release/xemacs-21.4.22-2.i686/build=/usr/src/debug/xema
> Ken Brown writes:
> On 1/23/2015 5:57 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>> gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -Wimplicit-function-declaration
-fdebug-prefix-map=/cygdrive/d/misc/src/release/xemacs-21.4.22-2.i686/build=/usr/src/debug/xemacs-21.4.22-2
-fdebug-prefix-map=/cygdrive/d/misc/src/release/xe
Hi, Volker -
Vin wrote:
>> I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
Volker wrote:
> Here we are
A few thoughts:
1. You need to use the most recent XEmacs sources from mercurial.
2. You must have an old version of libpng installed, because 21.4.22
won't compile with the
On 1/14/2015 4:19 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/14/2015 12:46 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as well
(temporary file generation) that also affect Maxima from ports.
If it's a problem with the Cygwin DLL, it would be
On 1/23/2015 5:57 AM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
gcc -c -ggdb -O2 -pipe -Wimplicit-function-declaration
-fdebug-prefix-map=/cygdrive/d/misc/src/release/xemacs-21.4.22-2.i686/build=/usr/src/debug/xemacs-21.4.22-2
-fdebug-prefix-map=/cygdrive/d/misc/src/release/xemacs-21.4.22-2.i686/src/xemacs-21.4.
> Volker Zell writes:
> Hi
> I'm on business, no access to the logs...I will come back to this on
friday.
Here we are
> Ciao
> Volker
> Vin Shelton writes:
>> Volker -
>> I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
gcc -c -ggdb -O
Hi
I'm on business, no access to the logs...I will come back to this on friday.
Ciao
Volker
> Vin Shelton writes:
> Volker -
> I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
> Thanks,
> Vin Shelton
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Dr. Volker
> On Jan 16 09:08, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > On 1/15/2015 2:03 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > >On 1/14/2015 3:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >>Hi folks,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
> > >>the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the
On Jan 16 09:08, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 1/15/2015 2:03 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >On 1/14/2015 3:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>Hi folks,
> >>
> >>
> >>it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
> >>the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
>
On 1/15/2015 2:03 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 1/14/2015 3:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
pure-ftpdKostya Altukhov
I will look on it
Regard
2015-01-14 16:13 Corinna Vinschen
:
|
|
| it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
| the 32 bit distro.
|
| ctorrentJari Aalto
| suckJari Aalto
Done. Rebuilt and uploaded.
Jari
pgpNWtFsFUQDW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
The problem is that we still have packages requiring libopenssl098.
These need rebuilding or removing.
,
David Rothenberger , Reini Urban
Subject: [HEADSUP] Dropping libopenssl098 from distro
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
The problem is that we still have packages requ
Hi Vin,
Hi Volker,
On Jan 15 09:12, Vin Shelton wrote:
> Marco/Volker et al -
> [...]
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Marco Atzeri <...> wrote:
> > Question:
> > 0) does it work ?
> [...]
> > 2) have you tried a 64 build also ?
>
> No, but based on feedback from the xemacs-beta mailing list, I
Marco/Volker et al -
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 1/15/2015 1:31 PM, Vin Shelton wrote:
>
>>>
>>> It used to compile but was not usable because of broken subprocess
>>> support. Now it doesn't even compile :-(
>>> Ciao
>>>Volker
>>>
>
>> Volker -
>>
>> I can build
On Jan 15 14:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 1/14/2015 3:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >
> >it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
> >the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
> >
> > pure-ftpd Kostya Altukhov
>
> I will loo
On 1/14/2015 3:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
pure-ftpdKostya Altukhov
I will look on it
Regards
Marco
On 1/15/2015 1:57 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 15 13:50, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 1/15/2015 1:31 PM, Vin Shelton wrote:
It used to compile but was not usable because of broken subprocess
support. Now it doesn't even compile :-(
Ciao
Volker
Volker -
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cy
On Jan 15 13:50, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 1/15/2015 1:31 PM, Vin Shelton wrote:
>
> >>
> >> It used to compile but was not usable because of broken subprocess
> >> support. Now it doesn't even compile :-(
> >> Ciao
> >>Volker
> >>
>
> >Volker -
> >
> >I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. Wha
On 1/15/2015 1:31 PM, Vin Shelton wrote:
>>
>> It used to compile but was not usable because of broken subprocess
>> support. Now it doesn't even compile :-(
>> Ciao
>>Volker
>>
Volker -
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
Thanks,
Vin Shelton
Question:
0
Volker -
I can build XEmacs on 32-bit Cygwin. What doesn't work for you?
Thanks,
Vin Shelton
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Dr. Volker Zell
wrote:
>> David Stacey writes:
>
> > On 14/01/15 14:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> The following packages have dependecies of their own
> David Stacey writes:
> On 14/01/15 14:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> The following packages have dependecies of their own, so they can't
>> go away until the dependent packages have been rebuilt:
>>
>> libpqMarco Atzeri
>>
>> required by:
>>
On 14/01/15 14:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The following packages have dependecies of their own, so they can't
go away until the dependent packages have been rebuilt:
libpqMarco Atzeri
required by:
xemacs Dr. Volker Zell
Some time ago, there was a pro
On 1/14/2015 12:46 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as well
(temporary file generation) that also affect Maxima from ports.
If it's a problem with the Cygwin DLL, it would be nice to get a
bug report and, preferred
Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as well
>> (temporary file generation) that also affect Maxima from ports.
>
> If it's a problem with the Cygwin DLL, it would be nice to get a
> bug report and, preferredly, an STC, so we have a chance to
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 15:13 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
> the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
> The problem is that we still have packages requiring libopenssl098.
> These need rebuilding or rem
On Jan 14 18:15, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > clisp and xemacs need rebuilding against libpq5. libsasl2-sql
> > is old and unused and can go away.
>
> Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as well
> (temporary file generation) that also affe
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> clisp and xemacs need rebuilding against libpq5. libsasl2-sql
> is old and unused and can go away.
Clisp is not yet ported to 64bit and it has problems under 32bit as well
(temporary file generation) that also affect Maxima from ports. ONe of
the things hol
Hi folks,
it's really *really* overdue to remove the OpenSSL 0.98 DLLs from
the 32 bit distro. Fortunately they were never in the 64 bit distro.
The problem is that we still have packages requiring libopenssl098.
These need rebuilding or removing.
The following packages need simple rebuilding:
63 matches
Mail list logo
