Re: [ITA] doxygen

2020-10-17 Thread Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps
On 10/17/2020 9:43 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: There's no need for a new release at the moment, but I'm attaching the cygport file I would use if there were. It differs in only very minor ways from the current cygport file (also attached). For your problem with the debuginfo that

Re: [ITA] doxygen

2020-10-17 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: > There's no need for a new release at the moment, but I'm attaching the > cygport > file I would use if there were. It differs in only very minor ways from the > current cygport file (also attached). For your problem with the debuginfo that we've briefly discussed on IRC: I

Re: [ITA] doxygen

2018-11-12 Thread Andrew Schulman
> Am 11.11.2018 um 23:38 schrieb Ken Brown: > > There's no need for a new release at the moment, but I'm attaching the > > cygport > > file I would use if there were. It differs in only very minor ways from the > > current cygport file (also attached). > > > > I've tested that the upstream git re

Re: [ITA] doxygen

2018-11-12 Thread Andrew Schulman
> Am 11.11.2018 um 23:38 schrieb Ken Brown: > > There's no need for a new release at the moment, but I'm attaching the > > cygport > > file I would use if there were. It differs in only very minor ways from the > > current cygport file (also attached). > > > > I've tested that the upstream git re

Re: [ITA] doxygen

2018-11-11 Thread Marco Atzeri
Am 11.11.2018 um 23:38 schrieb Ken Brown: There's no need for a new release at the moment, but I'm attaching the cygport file I would use if there were. It differs in only very minor ways from the current cygport file (also attached). I've tested that the upstream git repo builds and passes all

[ITA] doxygen

2018-11-11 Thread Ken Brown
There's no need for a new release at the moment, but I'm attaching the cygport file I would use if there were. It differs in only very minor ways from the current cygport file (also attached). I've tested that the upstream git repo builds and passes all tests. Ken NAME="doxygen" VERSION=1.8.15

Re: [ITA] doxygen

2012-09-29 Thread Andrew Schulman
> > Hi. > > I contacted the doxygen maintainer, Warren Young, privately because I > had encountered a bug [1] in doxygen 1.7.4. I knew that this bug was > fixed in later versions of doxygen, and I asked if he could upload a > more recent version. Warren replied and very kindly offered me the

Re: [ITA] doxygen

2012-09-29 Thread marco atzeri
On 9/29/2012 10:33 AM, David Stacey wrote: Hi. I contacted the doxygen maintainer, Warren Young, privately because I had encountered a bug [1] in doxygen 1.7.4. I knew that this bug was fixed in later versions of doxygen, and I asked if he could upload a more recent version. Warren replied and

[ITA] doxygen

2012-09-29 Thread David Stacey
Hi. I contacted the doxygen maintainer, Warren Young, privately because I had encountered a bug [1] in doxygen 1.7.4. I knew that this bug was fixed in later versions of doxygen, and I asked if he could upload a more recent version. Warren replied and very kindly offered me the maintenance o

Re: [ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-02 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Max Bowsher wrote: | There is a copy of the libpng source code embedded in the doxygen source | package. By default it builds a private copy of libpng and embeds it in | the doxygen binaries. This seemed to me like needless duplication, so I | made

Re: [ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-02 Thread Max Bowsher
Dave Korn wrote: > Max Bowsher wrote on 02 May 2008 02:45: > >> Warren Young wrote: >>> Dave Korn wrote: requires: cygwin libpng12 The requires: line looks wrong to meWhy libpng? >>> Ask Max. :) >> Last time I looked there was a copy of libpng embedded in the doxygen >> source

RE: [ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-02 Thread Dave Korn
Warren Young wrote on 02 May 2008 00:10: > I can't get graphviz to build cleanly under cygport yet. Looks like you may not need to need to! Volker's sense of timing is impeccable :) cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today

RE: [ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-02 Thread Dave Korn
Max Bowsher wrote on 02 May 2008 02:45: > Warren Young wrote: >> Dave Korn wrote: >>> requires: cygwin libpng12 >>> >>> The requires: line looks wrong to meWhy libpng? >> >> Ask Max. :) > > Last time I looked there was a copy of libpng embedded in the doxygen > source tree. Building anoth

Re: [ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Warren Young wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: >> requires: cygwin libpng12 >> >> The requires: line looks wrong to meWhy libpng? > > Ask Max. :) Last time I looked there was a copy of libpng embedded in the doxygen source tree. Building another copy seemed rather dumb when it's in the distro as a

Re: [ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Dave Korn wrote: requires: cygwin libpng12 The requires: line looks wrong to meWhy libpng? Ask Max. :) It may have had to do with a historical ability to use graphviz/dot or something like that. Max's latest doesn't do this, nor does mine, because I can't get graphviz to build cleanl

RE: [ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-01 Thread Dave Korn
Warren Young wrote on 01 May 2008 23:15: > Taking over maintainership of this package from Max Bowsher. Ported > build from g-b-s to cygport and updated from 1.5.1 to 1.5.5, so I'd like > at least one GTG before I post the RFU message. > > http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/doxygen/setup.hint sdesc: "A

[ITA] doxygen-1.5.5-1

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Taking over maintainership of this package from Max Bowsher. Ported build from g-b-s to cygport and updated from 1.5.1 to 1.5.5, so I'd like at least one GTG before I post the RFU message. http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/doxygen/setup.hint http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/doxygen/doxygen-1.5.5-1.tar.bz2 ht