Am 19.07.2018 um 18:43 schrieb Brian Inglis:
Will or should the ping package setup entry be replaced by an _obsolete category
entry saying it has been obsoleted by and requires inetutils-ping, as with other
replaced packages e.g. man?
not needed. Takeshi called the sub package "ping" so it is
Am 19.07.2018 um 13:35 schrieb Jon Turney:
I'm not sure what should happen to the entry for ping in
cygwin-pkg-maint. I guess it can be removed as that package no longer
has a separate existence?
removing it seems the simpler way
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Vi
On 2018-07-19 05:35, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 19/07/2018 11:04, Takashi Yano wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:26:17 +0200
>> Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>> Probably "calm" will complain of ping in two directories when you
>>> upload, but Jon should be able to solve it
>> I received the following error messa
On Jul 19 12:35, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 19/07/2018 11:04, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:26:17 +0200
> > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > Probably "calm" will complain of ping in two directories when you
> > > upload, but Jon should be able to solve it
> >
> > I received the following err
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:35:26 +0100
Jon Turney wrote:
> Sure. I moved the old ping package, and set this to be re-tried.
Thank you very much.
> I'm not sure what should happen to the entry for ping in
> cygwin-pkg-maint. I guess it can be removed as that package no longer
> has a separate exist
On 19/07/2018 11:04, Takashi Yano wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:26:17 +0200
Marco Atzeri wrote:
Probably "calm" will complain of ping in two directories when you
upload, but Jon should be able to solve it
I received the following error message as your prediction.
Jon, could you please fix?
ER
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:26:17 +0200
Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Probably "calm" will complain of ping in two directories when you
> upload, but Jon should be able to solve it
I received the following error message as your prediction.
Jon, could you please fix?
ERROR: package 'ping' is at paths x86/relea
Am 19.07.2018 um 02:44 schrieb Takashi Yano:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:26:17 +0200
Marco Atzeri wrote:
Am 18.07.2018 um 15:44 schrieb Takashi Yano:
Thanks. I have just revised inetutils package including ping package
as follows. Could you please check again?
Tested only, seems good.
The replacem
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:26:17 +0200
Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Am 18.07.2018 um 15:44 schrieb Takashi Yano:
> > Thanks. I have just revised inetutils package including ping package
> > as follows. Could you please check again?
>
> Tested only, seems good.
> The replacement ping and ping6 seem to work fi
Am 18.07.2018 um 15:44 schrieb Takashi Yano:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:22:28 +0200
Marco Atzeri wrote:
Am 18.07.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Takashi Yano:
How about providing ping package as a separated sub-package(?) of
inetutils just like inetutils-server package?
it should be the simplest way
Tha
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:22:28 +0200
Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Am 18.07.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Takashi Yano:
> > How about providing ping package as a separated sub-package(?) of
> > inetutils just like inetutils-server package?
> >
>
> it should be the simplest way
Thanks. I have just revised inetutils
On 18/07/2018 00:29, Takashi Yano wrote:
Name: Takashi Yano
Package: inetutils
BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY
Done.
Am 18.07.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Takashi Yano:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 16:28:12 +0200
marco atzeri wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Marco and Takashi, what about using ping/ping6 from inetutils but
providing them in a ping package on their own? Would you mind to
discu
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 16:28:12 +0200
marco atzeri wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Marco and Takashi, what about using ping/ping6 from inetutils but
> > providing them in a ping package on their own? Would you mind to
> > discuss this between the two of you? Wh
Name: Takashi Yano
Package: inetutils
BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY
Comment: "2048-bit RSA, converted by yano@Express5800-S70 from OpenSSH"
B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQC7Q3hfohMju7VRYox4h3SWsqKYzwKS8zlePVtOu/
Ihyj2lMH/bMhhzwoVuo3rS3+Fe68ohgDqv9EIJT6hax+w/feu3/c9oLoBRNWDlDM1DPFo8
SG4sBVCC3wpC3W+
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 17 19:41, Takashi Yano wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:14:46 +0900
>> Takashi Yano wrote:
>> > ping/ping6 in inetutils also require administrator right as well.
>>
>> I have noticed that current ping package, as well as ping/ping6
On Jul 17 19:41, Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:14:46 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
> > ping/ping6 in inetutils also require administrator right as well.
>
> I have noticed that current ping package, as well as ping/ping6 in
> inetutils, works without administrator privilege in Windows
On 15/07/2018 22:05, Marco Atzeri wrote:
Am 15.07.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Takashi Yano:
Hi,
I would like to take over the maintenance of inetutils package,
which is currently orphaned. I have already prepared an updated
inetutils package as follows.
Change History
-- inetutils-1.9.4-1 -
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:14:46 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> ping/ping6 in inetutils also require administrator right as well.
I have noticed that current ping package, as well as ping/ping6 in
inetutils, works without administrator privilege in Windows 10.
It seems that the policy of raw socket acce
On 2018-07-16 02:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 16 16:14, Takashi Yano wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:24:28 -0600
>> Brian Inglis wrote:
>>> I removed that package from my system because it required elevated admin
>>> privileges to work, whereas Windows ping uses IcmpSendEcho API to bypass
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 16 16:14, Takashi Yano wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:24:28 -0600
>> Brian Inglis wrote:
>> > I removed that package from my system because it required elevated admin
>> > privileges to work, whereas Windows ping uses IcmpSendEc
On Jul 16 16:14, Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:24:28 -0600
> Brian Inglis wrote:
> > I removed that package from my system because it required elevated admin
> > privileges to work, whereas Windows ping uses IcmpSendEcho API to bypass the
> > elevated admin privilege required to acc
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:24:28 -0600
Brian Inglis wrote:
> I removed that package from my system because it required elevated admin
> privileges to work, whereas Windows ping uses IcmpSendEcho API to bypass the
> elevated admin privilege required to access raw sockets and send an ICMP Echo
> request
On 2018-07-15 15:05, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Am 15.07.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Takashi Yano:
>> I would like to take over the maintenance of inetutils package,
>> which is currently orphaned. I have already prepared an updated
>> inetutils package as follows.
>> Change History
>> -- inetutils-1
Am 16.07.2018 um 06:55 schrieb Takashi Yano:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:05:39 +0200
Marco Atzeri wrote:
builds fine and passes the tests.
Thank you for checking.
Any chance to provide also ping so
we can obsolete the ancient ping package ?
I have succeeded to build ping/ping6 in inetutils pac
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:05:39 +0200
Marco Atzeri wrote:
> builds fine and passes the tests.
Thank you for checking.
> Any chance to provide also ping so
> we can obsolete the ancient ping package ?
I have succeeded to build ping/ping6 in inetutils package and
confirmed they seem to work correctl
Am 15.07.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Takashi Yano:
Hi,
I would like to take over the maintenance of inetutils package,
which is currently orphaned. I have already prepared an updated
inetutils package as follows.
Change History
-- inetutils-1.9.4-1 -- 11 Jul 2018 ---
* Updated to lat
Hi,
I would like to take over the maintenance of inetutils package,
which is currently orphaned. I have already prepared an updated
inetutils package as follows.
Change History
-- inetutils-1.9.4-1 -- 11 Jul 2018 ---
* Updated to latest upstream release
* Enabled IPv6 support
* E
28 matches
Mail list logo
