On Jan 7 19:42, Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
You must be reading her message differently from the way I did.
Yaakov got the message basically right. I used the gc package as an
unfortunate example but this doesn't invalidate the fact that it would
be much more feasible to have the extra libs your
Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1
On Jan 7 19:42, Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
You must be reading her message differently from the way I did.
Yaakov got the message basically right. I used the gc package as an
unfortunate example
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
Yaakov said I should submit ITP's for those dependent libraries, and that the
question of interest in Macaulay2 is moot until then, but you say I don't have
to submit ITP's for them, because they are either already
Dear Cygwin,
I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no positive
votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there were any interest
in having it in cygwin, there would have been a positive vote. I understand
that 5 are required.
As I said before, Macaulay 2
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:04:39PM -0600, Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no
positive votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there
were any interest in having it in cygwin, there would have been a
positive vote. I
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I don't see it in Fedora 10 but it looks like it was included in the
extras package for older Fedoras.
...But this does not automatically qualify Macaulay2 for inclusion in
the Cygwin distribution.
cgf
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:14:26 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1
Reply-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:04:39PM -0600, Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
I submitted an ITP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no positive
votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there were any
interest
in having it in cygwin, there would have been a positive vote.
-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1
...
On 14 November, Corinna explained[1] that you (or someone else) will
need to ITP the yet-unpackaged dependencies as well before this can be
seriously considered. AFAICS that hasn't happened yet, so I think the
question of interest is still
Daniel R Grayson writes:
Dear Cygwin,
We'd like to distribute Macaulay 2 as an official cygwin package. The
package
is used by hundreds of mathematicians as part of their research, and
hundreds
of published research papers, listed on our web site have cited it. It
has
On Nov 13 12:16, Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
PS: Macaulay2 depends on various other 3rd party packages, which are not yet
set up as cygwin packages, namely: singular-factory, gc, singular-libfac, and
ntl.
Ouch.
I don't suppose someone has come forward to create those packages...
Our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The gc package at least might be useful for others as well.
If by gc you mean the Boehm-Demers-Weiser garbage collector library,
it's already packaged as libgc.
Yaakov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9
On Nov 14 03:00, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The gc package at least might be useful for others as well.
If by gc you mean the Boehm-Demers-Weiser garbage collector library,
it's already packaged as libgc.
Uh,
That's the one, thanks!
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:00:18 -0600
From: Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The gc package at least might be useful for others
2008/11/13 Corinna:
Yes, definitely. I'm not familiar with this stuff at all, so I would be
glad if some other maintainer (Reini? You're mathomatica maintainer so
you might have some affinity...) would take a look.
Sorry, I'm terribly busy at work, and only have my laptop around.
--
Reini
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:52:16 -0600
From: Daniel R. Grayson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1
...
It is not included in a major Linux distribution.
Oops, no, I was wrong. It seems to be included in Fedora 8, 9, 10, thanks to
Rex Dieter, see
On Nov 13 08:23, Daniel R. Grayson wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:52:16 -0600
From: Daniel R. Grayson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1
...
It is not included in a major Linux distribution.
Oops, no, I was wrong. It seems
PS: Macaulay2 depends on various other 3rd party packages, which are not yet
set up as cygwin packages, namely: singular-factory, gc, singular-libfac, and
ntl.
I don't suppose someone has come forward to create those packages...
Our Makefile is set up to automatically download the source code
Dear Cygwin,
We'd like to distribute Macaulay 2 as an official cygwin package. The package
is used by hundreds of mathematicians as part of their research, and hundreds
of published research papers, listed on our web site have cited it. It has
been developed over the years through generous
19 matches
Mail list logo
