Hi,
Sorry about the delay with getting back to this stuff.
I'd like to ask a few quick questions before i send my formal ITP's
1) should i send a separate ITP email for each one or one for all of them?
2) bundling - If i need to include a new tool/lib to support a particular
feature
such as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Tim O'Callaghan on 11/18/2005 4:04 AM:
I'd like to ask a few quick questions before i send my formal ITP's
1) should i send a separate ITP email for each one or one for all of them?
If they are for related packages, one email will do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about the delay with getting back to this stuff.
I'd like to ask a few quick questions before i send my formal ITP's
1) should i send a separate ITP email for each one or one for all of them?
Choose based on
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 05:57:14AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
3) If a package needs a specific tool to build it, such as asciidoc being
needed for
git documentation, does it also need to be supported or not? if so does
it need
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:14:59PM +0100, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
I was thinking about the current distro method, its probably a stupid
question, but i was wondering why don't you support, or have tools to
convert rpm/dpkg type build packages? Cygwin seems to have native rpm
dpkg tools and most
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:05:07AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:14:59PM +0100, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
I was thinking about the current distro method, its probably a stupid
question, but i was wondering why don't you support, or have tools to
convert rpm/dpkg type
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:48:34PM +0100, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:05:07AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:14:59PM +0100, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
I was thinking about the current distro method, its probably a stupid
question, but i was wondering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 05:57:14AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
3) If a package needs a specific tool to build it, such as asciidoc being
needed for
git documentation, does it also need to be supported or not? if so does
