Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I don't know that and a search of the debian site for the word "mingw"
> does not unearth any hits.
Debian's package search page is not always that great. But they do
provide three packages (mingw32, mingw32-binutils, and mingw32-runtime)
which together form a linux-h
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:38:02AM -0500, Tacvek wrote:
>"Corinna Vinschen" wrote:
>>Charles said it all. Thanks for the offer, but MingW packages really
>>don't belong in the Cygwin distro, but in the MingW distro.
>
>I'm sorry, but on this one I must respectfully dissagree.
>
>While Cygwin is cl
"Corinna Vinschen" wrote:
Charles said it all. Thanks for the offer, but MingW packages really
don't
belong in the Cygwin distro, but in the MingW distro.
I'm sorry, but on this one I must respectfully dissagree.
While Cygwin is clearly a disto, i find mingw to be more a compilation
target pl
Ok, thanks for all the info, I didn't know that mingw.sf.net was
distributing packages as I can now see. I will try there. Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 04:11:05PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Feb 8 09:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> Charles Wilson wrote:
>> >Peter Quiring wrote:
>> >>I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They
>> >>are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng,
>> >
>> >Sorry, but I h
On Feb 8 09:56, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Peter Quiring wrote:
> >>I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They
> >>are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng,
> >
> >Sorry, but I have to veto these (but see good news, below)
>
> Just to clarify: "veto"
Charles Wilson wrote:
Peter Quiring wrote:
I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They
are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng,
Sorry, but I have to veto these (but see good news, below)
Just to clarify: "veto" is too strong a word for me to use, since my
name isn't
On Feb 8 01:51, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Peter Quiring wrote:
> >I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They
> >are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng,
>
> Sorry, but I have to veto these (but see good news, below)
>
> and openssl.
>
> I'll leave Corinna to comment on
Peter Quiring wrote:
I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They
are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng,
Sorry, but I have to veto these (but see good news, below)
and openssl.
I'll leave Corinna to comment on this one.
The conventions I
used are slightly different
Okay,
I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They
are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng, and openssl. The conventions I
used are slightly different from cygwin standards but were neccessary to
compile under the mingw system. The source includes two scripts, one to
10 matches
Mail list logo