Hello,
I want to contribute/maintain glib.
Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/
Renamed & repackaged tarballs:
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib2-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/setup.hint
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib2-devel-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2
http://anfa
Gerrit wrote:
> Hello,
> I want to contribute/maintain glib.
> Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/
> Renamed & repackaged tarballs:
[...]
> Devel package setup.hint:
> ===
> category: Libs Devel
> requires: glib
> sdesc: "headers and import libraries for glib"
This reads actually:
category:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
I want to contribute/maintain glib.
I can't vote, but this seems good to go. I installed it,
replacing an older version that I was using for the Midnight
Commander and irssi I build some time ago.
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contac
> Gerrit P Haase writes:
> Hello,
> I want to contribute/maintain glib.
> Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/
Hi Gerrit, during the build stage I get the following error:
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glib-2.4.2/.build/gobject'
echo "#ifndef __G_MARSHAL_H__" > xgen-gmh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
| Hi Gerrit, during the build stage I get the following error:
|
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glib-2.4.2/.build/gobject'
| echo "#ifndef __G_MARSHAL_H__" > xgen-gmh \
| && echo "#define __G_MARSHAL_H__" >> xgen-gmh \
| &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
| PS: By the way I vote for the /opt/gnome2 hirarchy for this package.
As I've stated already, this is also my opinion.
To make this easier for Gerrit to decide, I've written the attached
scripts which should be included in the gl
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
| PS: By the way I vote for the /opt/gnome2 hirarchy for this package.
As I've stated already, this is also my opinion.
To make this easier for Gerrit to decide, I've written the attached
scripts which should be included in the gli
Dr. schrieb:
>> Gerrit P Haase writes:
> > Hello,
> > I want to contribute/maintain glib.
> > Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/
> Hi Gerrit, during the build stage I get the following error:
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glib-2.4.2/.build/gobject'
> echo "#ifndef _
Hi Voker,
> PS: By the way I vote for the /opt/gnome2 hirarchy for this package.
please start a separate thread to discuss this issue.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
Yaakov schrieb:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> | Hi Gerrit, during the build stage I get the following error:
> |
> | make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/glib-2.4.2/.build/gobject'
> | echo "#ifndef __G_MARSHAL_H__" > xgen-gmh \
> | && echo "#define
Frédéric schrieb:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>> | PS: By the way I vote for the /opt/gnome2 hirarchy for this package.
>>
>> As I've stated already, this is also my opinion.
>>
>> To make this easier for Gerrit to decide, I've written the attached
>>
Volker,
[...]
> Here a windows popup box appears with glib-genmarshal.exe - Unable To
> Locate DLL
> The dynamic link library cygglib-2.0-0.dll could not be found in the
> specified path.
Forget the patch with the static library. Though it works for
glib-genmarshal it will fail later with gobje
> Gerrit P Haase writes:
> Forget the patch with the static library. Though it works for
> glib-genmarshal it will fail later with gobject-scan which is more
> problematic. Unless someone figures out how to build gobject-scan
> statically I need to find another solution.
Too
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
No and yes, and IIRC, the script doesn't work because the libtool-devel
creates a dummy executable, so if there are glib-genmarshal and
glib-genmarshal.exe in the same directory, glib-genmarshal.exe will be
executed at first and since it is a dummy it fails.
Actually, libtool
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
It's such things that makes some people think GLib is a GNOME
or graphical library and should be avoided at all.
I agree. There are some overlappings though. But since there are
already some of the core libraries of the GNOME desktop in /usr we
should just stay with it.
I
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Forget the patch with the static library. Though it works for
glib-genmarshal it will fail later with gobject-scan which is more
problematic. Unless someone figures out how to build gobject-scan
statically I need to find another solution.
The simple solution would be to add
Hi Charles,
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>>It's such things that makes some people think GLib is a GNOME
>>>or graphical library and should be avoided at all.
>> I agree. There are some overlappings though. But since there are
>> already some of the core libraries of the GNOME desktop in /usr we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
| Renamed & repackaged tarballs:
| http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib2-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2
| http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/setup.hint
|
| http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib2-devel-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2
| http://anfaenge
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
If we've decided to keep this in /usr, then the binary
packages look good to me; programs built against previous
versions of glib2 are working fine, and I built perl-Glib
against this and it passed all its tests.
Since GLib isn't a GNOME or graphical
Hi Yaakov,
> The build script needs a couple of changes; the patch is attached. The
Applied, though , if you don't have gtk-doc installed won't this be
automatically disabled? Anyway, I'll try to provide gtk-doc as a
package.
> rest of us don't have a working gtk-doc installation, so
> - --d
Hi Yaakov,
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> | Renamed & repackaged tarballs:
> | http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib2-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2
> | http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/setup.hint
> |
> | http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib2-devel-2.4
Hi Yaakov,
> The build script needs a couple of changes; the patch is attached. The
> rest of us don't have a working gtk-doc installation, so
> - --disable-gtk-doc is needed. Note that the resulting glib2-doc tarball
> is half the size of yours, although the file list is the same AFAICT;
> not
Volker,
>> Gerrit P Haase writes:
> > Forget the patch with the static library. Though it works for
> > glib-genmarshal it will fail later with gobject-scan which is more
> > problematic. Unless someone figures out how to build gobject-scan
> > statically I need to find anot
Hi Marcel,
> Hi Yaakov,
>> The build script needs a couple of changes; the patch is attached. The
>> rest of us don't have a working gtk-doc installation, so
>> - --disable-gtk-doc is needed. Note that the resulting glib2-doc tarball
>> is half the size of yours, although the file list is the s
Gerrit wrote:
lots of stuff, but no screenshot was attached, posted here now:
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/docbook/setup.exe.JPG
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
25 matches
Mail list logo
