From: Yaakov Selkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ITP-3] glib2-2.4.2-1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
| I just wanted to be sure that GTK builds with my GLib version;)
| I think I am finished with it this evening.
Been a while since then; any luck?
I've built libIDL, ORBit2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
| I just wanted to be sure that GTK builds with my GLib version;)
| I think I am finished with it this evening.
Been a while since then; any luck?
I've built libIDL, ORBit2, mdbtools, libgda, and perl-Glib against your
glib2
Yaakov wrote:
I think I've pointed this out with ALL of your packages, but any -devel
or -doc packages need to have an external-source: line in their
setup.hint.
I'll change it, no problem.
Once this is fixed, these packages are GTG. Let's get this in the
distro already!
I'll try to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
| I'll try to finish gtk+ this week and then ITP it and put the four base
| libs up together. After these are up, the libs depending on glib2 may
| be uploaded (after review of course).
Why not just upload each package when it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
| Now I reconfigure with my patched libtool, the patch will grow but it
| will work for sure (now also with --disable-gtk-doc which in fact makes
| the doc package smaller).
|
| The new package to replace the old one is posted
Volker,
Gerrit P Haase writes:
Forget the patch with the static library. Though it works for
glib-genmarshal it will fail later with gobject-scan which is more
problematic. Unless someone figures out how to build gobject-scan
statically I need to find another solution.
