On 31/05/2010 07:23, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2010-05-29 17:28, Dave Korn wrote:
So, since you asked, would you care to give it a once over and
check that I got all the cygport stuff right this time?
Looks like that works.
I got a bug report off-list, about a couple of functions
On Jun 1 03:01, Dave Korn wrote:
On 31/05/2010 16:54, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Care to update the cygwin-pkg-maint file as well?
Done. While I was doing that, I noticed a few minor ordering errors appear
to have crept in with time; shall we run 'sort' on it?
Yes, please.
Thanks,
On 2010-05-29 17:28, Dave Korn wrote:
So, since you asked, would you care to give it a once over and check that I
got all the cygport stuff right this time?
Looks like that works.
Yaakov
On 31/05/2010 07:23, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2010-05-29 17:28, Dave Korn wrote:
So, since you asked, would you care to give it a once over and
check that I
got all the cygport stuff right this time?
Looks like that works.
Thanks for double checking, I'll upload it and send an
On 31/05/2010 16:54, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 31 15:34, Dave Korn wrote:
On 31/05/2010 07:23, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2010-05-29 17:28, Dave Korn wrote:
So, since you asked, would you care to give it a once over and
check that I
got all the cygport stuff right this time?
Looks
On 18/05/2010 22:00, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2009-12-20 13:56, Dave Korn wrote:
libelf(*) is a requirement for supporting LTO in the upcoming GCC 4.5.0
(and beyond), and I needed to build myself a local copy so I could test
that, so I figured I might as well package it properly while I
