On 23/05/2016 15:59, Jon Turney wrote:
On 20/05/2016 16:10, Marco Atzeri wrote:
moving back to apps.
Sorry about that.
I'll get the hang of this email thing eventually.
The packages with no source package are currently
R_autorebase Marco Atzeri
base-cygwin Corinna Vinsch
On 20/05/2016 16:10, Marco Atzeri wrote:
moving back to apps.
Sorry about that.
I'll get the hang of this email thing eventually.
The packages with no source package are currently
R_autorebase Marco Atzeri
base-cygwin Corinna Vinschen
chere Dave Kilroy
cyg
On 20/05/2016 20:20, Achim Gratz wrote:
Marco Atzeri writes:
To move the documentation in a noarch package
I split lilypond in two source packages.
I'm not too enamored with this idea… we will eventually end up with the
possibility of having parts of packages noarch and other parts arch-ful.
T
Marco Atzeri writes:
> To move the documentation in a noarch package
> I split lilypond in two source packages.
I'm not too enamored with this idea… we will eventually end up with the
possibility of having parts of packages noarch and other parts arch-ful.
Trying to preempt that goal by going bers
moving back to apps.
On 20/05/2016 16:41, Jon Turney wrote:
On 19/05/2016 22:34, Marco Atzeri wrote:
To move the documentation in a noarch package
I split lilypond in two source packages.
http://matzeri.altervista.org/noarch/lilypond-doc/
http://matzeri.altervista.org/x86/lilypond/
http://matz
To move the documentation in a noarch package
I split lilypond in two source packages.
http://matzeri.altervista.org/noarch/lilypond-doc/
http://matzeri.altervista.org/x86/lilypond/
http://matzeri.altervista.org/x86_64/lilypond/
The documentation is just a copy of the upstream PDF so :
- the sou