On 5/15/2009 1:05 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 5/15/2009 10:46 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
If you release a new 1.5 version now then you will have a few weeks at
least
to work out any wrinkles. So, it might make sense to have a stable
version of
emacs since the old version apparently had so
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:34:09PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
One question: To follow the standard practice, I should give it a
different release number than the 1.7 version, presumably 23.0.92-2.
But it seems that all other package maintainers are using higher
release numbers for 1.7 than for 1.5.
On 5/15/2009 12:25 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
At any rate, I'm rather tired of several YEARS of choosing the
'Exp'erimental version of emacs from setup.exe, all because 22.1-3 works
better for me than the 'Stable' version. I'm all for whatever you
provide, and will be grateful for whatever you
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:04:10AM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 5/15/2009 12:25 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
At any rate, I'm rather tired of several YEARS of choosing the
'Exp'erimental version of emacs from setup.exe, all because 22.1-3 works
better for me than the 'Stable' version. I'm all for
On 5/15/2009 10:46 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
If you release a new 1.5 version now then you will have a few weeks at least
to work out any wrinkles. So, it might make sense to have a stable version of
emacs since the old version apparently had so many problems.
That sounds like a good
New test release.
cd release-2
wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
http://www.math.cornell.edu/~kbrown/cygwin-1.7/emacs/setup.hint \
http://www.math.cornell.edu/~kbrown/cygwin-1.7/emacs/emacs-23.0.92-1-src.tar.bz2
\
http://www.math.cornell.edu/~kbrown/cygwin-1.7/emacs/emacs-23.0.92-1.tar.bz2 \
On 5/14/2009 10:22 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
New test release.
Well, I'm off to a great start. I just realized that I forgot to edit
the README to reflect the fact that I'm the new maintainer. When I
built the packages a month ago, I thought I was just helping out.
Is there still time for me
On May 14 16:52, Ken Brown wrote:
On 5/14/2009 10:22 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
New test release.
Well, I'm off to a great start. I just realized that I forgot to edit
the README to reflect the fact that I'm the new maintainer. When I
built the packages a month ago, I thought I was just
Ken Brown wrote:
New test release.
cd release-2
wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
http://www.math.cornell.edu/~kbrown/cygwin-1.7/emacs/setup.hint \
http://www.math.cornell.edu/~kbrown/cygwin-1.7/emacs/emacs-23.0.92-1-src.tar.bz2
\
On 5/14/2009 4:55 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 14 16:52, Ken Brown wrote:
Well, I'm off to a great start. I just realized that I forgot to edit
the README to reflect the fact that I'm the new maintainer. When I
built the packages a month ago, I thought I was just helping out.
Is
On 5/14/2009 5:57 PM, Mark Harig wrote:
In case you were unaware, Emacs version 23.0.93.1 (pre-release test) has
been
available for a few weeks. It might be worth considering providing both
23.0.92
and 23.0.93 so that you can work out how to maintain two versions:
stable and unstable
(not
Ken Brown wrote:
On 5/14/2009 5:57 PM, Mark Harig wrote:
In case you were unaware, Emacs version 23.0.93.1 (pre-release test)
has been
available for a few weeks. It might be worth considering providing
both 23.0.92
and 23.0.93 so that you can work out how to maintain two versions:
stable and
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 07:41:30PM -0400, Mark Harig wrote:
Ken Brown wrote:
On 5/14/2009 5:57 PM, Mark Harig wrote:
In case you were unaware, Emacs version 23.0.93.1 (pre-release test)
has been available for a few weeks. It might be worth considering
providing both 23.0.92 and 23.0.93 so that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Christopher Faylor on 5/14/2009 7:50 PM:
People who are willing to use the not-yet-released Cygwin 1.7 and the
not-yet-released Emacs 23 ought to be expecting some instability.
Please don't argue with a package maintainer about what
14 matches
Mail list logo
