On 6/19/2009 1:33 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:50:01PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
According to Ken Brown on 6/18/2009 2:09 PM:
Thanks from me too, Eric. I noticed that you also added cygwin to the
requires: line of emacs-X11, even though emacs-X11 requires emacs
On 6/17/2009 10:10 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 07:22:33PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
According to Ken Brown on 6/17/2009 7:07 PM:
On 6/17/2009 6:22 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
Sorry for not mentioning this before you did the packaging, but can I
suggest that emacs-X11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ken Brown on 6/18/2009 2:09 PM:
Thanks from me too, Eric. I noticed that you also added cygwin to the
requires: line of emacs-X11, even though emacs-X11 requires emacs which
requires cygwin. Is this just a precaution in case
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:50:01PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
According to Ken Brown on 6/18/2009 2:09 PM:
Thanks from me too, Eric. I noticed that you also added cygwin to the
requires: line of emacs-X11, even though emacs-X11 requires emacs which
requires cygwin. Is this just a precaution in
Ken Brown wrote:
Since no one objected to my proposal for promoting emacs-23 to current
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2009-06/msg00090.html), I've prepared
new emacs packages for cygwin 1.7. I've bumped the package version to
-10, following Chuck's model for distinguishing 1.7 packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ken Brown on 6/17/2009 7:07 PM:
On 6/17/2009 6:22 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
Sorry for not mentioning this before you did the packaging, but can I
suggest that emacs-X11 package setup.hint should have font-adobe-dpi75
and font-misc-misc
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 07:22:33PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
According to Ken Brown on 6/17/2009 7:07 PM:
On 6/17/2009 6:22 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
Sorry for not mentioning this before you did the packaging, but can I
suggest that emacs-X11 package setup.hint should have font-adobe-dpi75
and
On Jun 11 11:43, Ken Brown wrote:
Since no one objected to my proposal for promoting emacs-23 to current
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2009-06/msg00090.html), I've prepared
new emacs packages for cygwin 1.7. I've bumped the package version to
-10, following Chuck's model for
Since no one objected to my proposal for promoting emacs-23 to current
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2009-06/msg00090.html), I've prepared
new emacs packages for cygwin 1.7. I've bumped the package version to
-10, following Chuck's model for distinguishing 1.7 packages from 1.5
packages.
