RE: [Review - Good to Go!] XmHTML 3.2-1: widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2

2004-02-13 Thread Rafael Kitover
>-Original Message- >From: cygwin-apps-ownercygwin.com On Behalf Of Dr. Volker Zell >Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:28 PM >To: cygwin-appscygwin.com >Subject: Re: [Review - Good to Go!] XmHTML 3.2-1: widget capable of displaying >HTML 3.2 > >I have addressed

Re: [Review - Good to Go!] XmHTML 3.2-1: widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2

2004-02-10 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> "Rafael" == Rafael Kitover writes: Rafael> The /usr/X11R6/share/doc thing is going to confuse a lot of people (huh? Rafael> where'd the package readme go?) I'd just put it into /usr/share/doc, even if a Rafael> precedent has been set for X11R6/share/doc, it's still ugly. And the

Re: [Review - Good to Go!] XmHTML 3.2-1: widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2

2004-02-06 Thread Volker Quetschke
Hi! Rafael> I haven't tried building anything that uses XmHTML, but I'm making the Rafael> assumption that since the testhtml program builds and works, that should not be Rafael> an issue. I build this especially for grace, which right now shows it's help with lynx in an xterm window.

Re: [Review - Good to Go!] XmHTML 3.2-1: widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2

2004-02-06 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> "Rafael" == Rafael Kitover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rafael> I haven't tried building anything that uses XmHTML, but I'm making the Rafael> assumption that since the testhtml program builds and works, that should not be Rafael> an issue. I build this especially for grace, whi

[Review - Good to Go!] XmHTML 3.2-1: widget capable of displaying HTML 3.2

2004-02-05 Thread Rafael Kitover
Binary package: looks very good and complete, not surprised given the maintainer. testhtml.exe works fine! It's ugly and slow, but that's an upstream problem :) I haven't tried building anything that uses XmHTML, but I'm making the assumption that since the testhtml program builds and works, that