Re: [Review - Good to go] suite3270 [Needs 1 more vote]

2003-12-02 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Corinna wrote: On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:26:24AM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote: That being said, I will list you as voting pro for suite3270. The suite3270 proposal is now only one vote away, as you stated. No, it's not. I voted already pro inclusion, right after Peter's first proposal. I say pro,

Re: [Review - Good to go] suite3270 [Needs 1 more vote]

2003-12-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:26:24AM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote: > That being said, I will list you as voting pro for suite3270. The suite3270 > proposal is now only one vote away, as you stated. No, it's not. I voted already pro inclusion, right after Peter's first proposal. Corinna -- Corinna Vi

Re: [Review - Good to go] suite3270 [Needs 1 more vote]

2003-12-01 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2003-12-02T00:00-0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote: ) Let's see, Igor voted pro, I obviously vote pro... now we need one more ) vote to upload. I don't normally list reviewers as voting "pro" automatically. I think it might be important that people can feel free to review package proposals without g

Re: [Review - Good to go] suite3270 [Needs 1 more vote]

2003-12-01 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Peter, Peter A. Castro wrote: Ugh... I just noticed that your all command is as follows: all) prep && conf && build && install && \ pkg && spkg && finish ; STATUS=$? ;; You don't have a 'strip' command in there; I checked the s3270 package and noticed that s3270.exe is 484 KiB, versus 170