David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 8/27/2007 1:50 PM, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/lighttpd/setup.hint (unchanged)
>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-1.tar.bz2
>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-1-src.tar.bz2
> Would it make sense to include the patc
On 8/27/2007 1:50 PM, Lapo Luchini wrote:
http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/lighttpd/setup.hint (unchanged)
http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-1.tar.bz2
http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-1-src.tar.bz2
Would it make sense to include the patch from
http://c-skills.blogspot.co
Eric Blake wrote:
> Uploaded, leaving 2.6.6-1 as previous. 2.6.2-3 and 2.6.3-1 are also still
> present.
>
2.6.6-1 has been used succesfully by many for much time, it's good to
leave that as [prev], but 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 can be safely deleted.
--
Lapo Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (OpenPGP & X.509)
ww
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Lapo Luchini on 8/27/2007 2:50 PM:
> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/lighttpd/setup.hint (unchanged)
> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-1.tar.bz2
> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-1-src.tar.bz2
Uploaded, leaving
http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/lighttpd/setup.hint (unchanged)
http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-1.tar.bz2
http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-1-src.tar.bz2
(*.bz2.sig for detached GPG signatures)
sdesc: "Fast remote file transfer program (can use existing data to
minimize t