[security fix] monotone-0.25.2-1

2006-03-18 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone/monotone-0.25.2-1-src.tar.bz2 http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone/monotone-0.25.2-1.tar.bz2 Excerpt from http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/setup.ini version: 0.25.2-1 install: ./monotone/monotone-0.25.2-1.tar.bz2 253

Re: [security fix] monotone-0.25.2-1

2006-03-19 Thread Lapo Luchini
Lapo Luchini wrote: > 0.26pre1-1 can remain as [test] > 0.25-1 can be [prev], but being pretty much identical (except for the > security fix) we could even do without a prev at all? dunno... BTW: I noticed that having installed version 0.25.2-1 setup.exe suggests me to "upgrade" to 0.25-1... it may

Re: [security fix] monotone-0.25.2-1

2006-03-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 19 12:29, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Lapo Luchini wrote: > > 0.26pre1-1 can remain as [test] > > 0.25-1 can be [prev], but being pretty much identical (except for the > > security fix) we could even do without a prev at all? dunno... > BTW: I noticed that having installed version 0.25.2-1 setup.e

Re: [security fix] monotone-0.25.2-1

2006-03-25 Thread Lapo Luchini
Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> BTW: I noticed that having installed version 0.25.2-1 setup.exe suggests >> me to "upgrade" to 0.25-1... it may be ASCII-ordering-true (no, in fact >> I notice that it is not) but anyway seems sensible to think that a >> "missing dot"'s value should be assumes as .0, isn'

Re: [security fix] monotone-0.25.2-1

2006-03-25 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Lapo Luchini on 3/25/2006 5:04 AM: > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone/setup.hint > [...] > curr: 0.25.2-1 > test: 0.26pre1-1 Uploaded all three files. For now, I left 0.25-1 on the servers, but it is not explicitly listed as prev i

Re: [security fix] monotone-0.25.2-1

2006-03-25 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Blake wrote: > Either acknowledge that we are okay to delete 0.25-1 (this is fine > - it is not a requirement that a package must provide a prev, > especially when there was a security fix), or provide an updated > setup.hint that lists prev: 0.25

Re: [security fix] monotone-0.25.2-1

2006-03-25 Thread Eric Blake
> Yes, I omitted a "prev" intentionally, it can be deleted. Done. Go ahead and send the announcement mail. > I hope the great 0.26 will be released soon, other than having cool > new features it will also remove the necessity to specify those things > in setup.hint (as [test] will be no more use