Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 07:17, Max Bowsher wrote:
+2003-08-18 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * win32.h: Undefine NOMINMAX before defining it, as libstdc++-v3 3.3.1
+ defines NOMINMAX itself.
Does it define it the same way? I'd rather we did
#ifndef NOMINMAX
+2003-08-18 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * win32.h: Undefine NOMINMAX before defining it, as libstdc++-v3 3.3.1
+ defines NOMINMAX itself.
Index: win32.h
===
RCS file: /home/max/cvsmirror/cygwin-apps-cvs/setup/win32.h,v
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:17:55PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
+2003-08-18 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * win32.h: Undefine NOMINMAX before defining it, as libstdc++-v3 3.3.1
+ defines NOMINMAX itself.
Um. What does this have to do with cygwin-apps?
cgf
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:17:55PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
+2003-08-18 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * win32.h: Undefine NOMINMAX before defining it, as libstdc++-v3 3.3.1
+ defines NOMINMAX itself.
Um. What does this have to do with cygwin-apps?
It's a
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:36:03PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:17:55PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
+2003-08-18 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * win32.h: Undefine NOMINMAX before defining it, as libstdc++-v3 3.3.1
+ defines NOMINMAX itself.
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 07:17, Max Bowsher wrote:
+2003-08-18 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+ * win32.h: Undefine NOMINMAX before defining it, as libstdc++-v3 3.3.1
+ defines NOMINMAX itself.
Does it define it the same way? I'd rather we did
#ifndef NOMINMAX
#define NOMINMAX
#endif
Rob
--