Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-04 Thread Steve Coleman
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 11:59:56PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Am Samstag, 2. August 2003 um 17:23 schriebst du: I am still unable to build Perl and I haven't found the problem yet. I'm seeking for volunteers to help tracking down this problem. I'm sorry

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:02:19PM -0400, Steve Coleman wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 11:59:56PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Am Samstag, 2. August 2003 um 17:23 schriebst du: I am still unable to build Perl and I haven't found the problem yet. I'm seeking for

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-04 Thread William A. Hoffman
Hi, I maintain the cmake package. I have tested it, and it only requires a recompile to work with cygwin 1.5.1. I am not sure how to proceed. Should I create binaries that require 1.5.1, and make them the -test version of the package. Then when 1.5.1 is officially released on 2003-08-23, I

1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
I'd like to shoot for making 1.5.x the current release on 2003-08-23. Are there any obstacles to that goal? cgf

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-02 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Christopher, Am Samstag, 2. August 2003 um 17:23 schriebst du: I'd like to shoot for making 1.5.x the current release on 2003-08-23. Are there any obstacles to that goal? I am still unable to build Perl and I haven't found the problem yet. I'm seeking for volunteers to help tracking

Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23?

2003-08-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 11:59:56PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Am Samstag, 2. August 2003 um 17:23 schriebst du: I'd like to shoot for making 1.5.x the current release on 2003-08-23. Are there any obstacles to that goal? I am still unable to build Perl and I haven't found the problem yet. I'm