On Mar 22 12:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 22 12:05, marco atzeri wrote:
> > On 3/22/2013 11:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >On Mar 22 07:03, marco atzeri wrote:
> > >>On 3/18/2013 1:41 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
> >
> > >>Corinna,
> > >>the only cygwin 64 issue is that make
> > >>need to
On Mar 22 12:05, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 3/22/2013 11:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 22 07:03, marco atzeri wrote:
> >>On 3/18/2013 1:41 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>
> >>Corinna,
> >>the only cygwin 64 issue is that make
> >>need to be restricted to -j1 to build
> >>lapack and fftw3 withou
On 3/22/2013 11:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 22 07:03, marco atzeri wrote:
On 3/18/2013 1:41 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
Corinna,
the only cygwin 64 issue is that make
need to be restricted to -j1 to build
lapack and fftw3 without failure
What version of the DLL are you using? 1.7.18-
On Mar 22 07:03, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 3/18/2013 1:41 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>
> >
> >Dave / Achim ,
> >any news for gfortran ?
>
> the new gfortran works fine,
> lapack buils and pass all the tests.
>
> Thanks
>
> Corinna,
> the only cygwin 64 issue is that make
> need to be restricted to
On 3/18/2013 1:41 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
Dave / Achim ,
any news for gfortran ?
the new gfortran works fine,
lapack buils and pass all the tests.
Thanks
Corinna,
the only cygwin 64 issue is that make
need to be restricted to -j1 to build
lapack and fftw3 without failure
Regards
Marco
On 3/17/2013 7:24 AM, marco atzeri wrote:
On 3/17/2013 6:33 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Since I am still carrying some patches for cmake, I went ahead and
uploaded a build; it also depends on the just-uploaded libarchive.
Yaakov,
qhull built fine with your cmake,
thanks
Dave / Achim ,
a
On 3/17/2013 6:33 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 07:24:49 +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
I built the 64 bit cmake version, but it segfaults on some tests.
So I am not sure if its cygwin dll or cmake fault.
Was this with -5 or -7? I'm finding -5 more reliable, despite the
limitat
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 07:24:49 +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
> I built the 64 bit cmake version, but it segfaults on some tests.
> So I am not sure if its cygwin dll or cmake fault.
Was this with -5 or -7? I'm finding -5 more reliable, despite the
limitation of no parallel make.
> If anyone is intere
On Mar 16 12:18, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 3/16/2013 11:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 16 07:24, marco atzeri wrote:
>
> >>
> >>I guess it is time to add the "long double" math functions to newlib
> >>that I skipped years ago...
> >
> >Oh, please!!! That would be incredible, fantastic, o
On 3/16/2013 11:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 16 07:24, marco atzeri wrote:
I guess it is time to add the "long double" math functions to newlib
that I skipped years ago...
Oh, please!!! That would be incredible, fantastic, outstanding. The
OpenBSD sources contain i686 and x86_64
On Mar 16 07:24, marco atzeri wrote:
> Hi,
> I built the 64 bit cmake version, but it segfaults on some tests.
> So I am not sure if its cygwin dll or cmake fault.
> Stackdump attached.
Probably Cygwin, unfortunately :(
> If anyone is interested to test it I can upload.
>
> Any news of gfortran
Hi,
I built the 64 bit cmake version, but it segfaults on some tests.
So I am not sure if its cygwin dll or cmake fault.
Stackdump attached.
If anyone is interested to test it I can upload.
Any news of gfortran ?
I would try building some of my math libs: fftw3, lapack...
I guess it is time to
12 matches
Mail list logo
