Max Bowsher schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
Shouldn't we then provide a cygperl5_8.dll symlinked to cygperl5_8_5.dll
also (in linux fashion), and apps should link against cygperl5_8.dll
resp. a more generic libperl.dll.a then?
otherwise you'll have to recompile all dependent apps.
You are forgetting so
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Another point is to use another name for the DLL in future (e.g.
cygperl-58.dll) so there would be no action needed for some package
maintainers if perl is upgraded from say 5.8.6 to 5.8.7.
please stay with cygperl5_8.dll, not another naming scheme.
my new pgperl (postgres)
Igor schrieb:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Igor schrieb:
>>
>> > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>
>> >> Christopher schrieb:
>> >>
>> >> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> >> >>I want to keep two prvious perl version availabl
Christopher schrieb:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:51:46PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>Christopher schrieb:
>>> If there are problems with perl 5.8.x, shouldn't we be fixing the
>>> problems?
>>
>>Sure, this is the way to go. However, I want to keep 5.6.1 around as
>>long as possible. Since i
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Igor schrieb:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
> >> Christopher schrieb:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> >> >>I want to keep two prvious perl version available, now I need to know:
>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:51:46PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Christopher schrieb:
>> If there are problems with perl 5.8.x, shouldn't we be fixing the
>> problems?
>
>Sure, this is the way to go. However, I want to keep 5.6.1 around as
>long as possible. Since it will [EMAIL PROTECTED] mirro
Christopher schrieb:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:58:14PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>
>>> Christopher schrieb:
>>>
>>> > On Tue, Aug 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:36:33PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>> >>I want to keep two prvious perl version avail
Reini schrieb:
> Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
>> I stillkeep perl-5.6.1 at the mirrors for people who don't believe that
>> the new perl-5.8 is ok. Now I have updated to 5.8.5 and removed 5.8.2
>> but got complaints because the postgres perl extension is linked against
>> 5.8.2 DLL.
> Shouldn't we
Igor schrieb:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Christopher schrieb:
>>
>> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> >>I want to keep two prvious perl version available, now I need to know:
>> >>is more than one tag for 'prev:' or 'test:' in setup.hint
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:58:14PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
>> Christopher schrieb:
>>
>> > On Tue, Aug 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:36:33PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> >>I want to keep two prvious perl version available, now I need to know:
>> >
Reini Urban wrote:
Shouldn't we then provide a cygperl5_8.dll symlinked to cygperl5_8_5.dll
also (in linux fashion), and apps should link against cygperl5_8.dll
resp. a more generic libperl.dll.a then?
otherwise you'll have to recompile all dependent apps.
You are forgetting something. The Windows
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Christopher schrieb:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> >>I want to keep two prvious perl version available, now I need to know:
> >>is more than one tag for 'prev:' or 'test:' in setup.hint files
> >>supported an
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
I stillkeep perl-5.6.1 at the mirrors for people who don't believe that
the new perl-5.8 is ok. Now I have updated to 5.8.5 and removed 5.8.2
but got complaints because the postgres perl extension is linked against
5.8.2 DLL.
Shouldn't we then provide a cygperl5_8.dll sy
Christopher schrieb:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>I want to keep two prvious perl version available, now I need to know:
>>is more than one tag for 'prev:' or 'test:' in setup.hint files
>>supported and handled correct by upset? At least setup.exe seems to
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:36:33PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>I want to keep two prvious perl version available, now I need to know:
>is more than one tag for 'prev:' or 'test:' in setup.hint files
>supported and handled correct by upset? At least setup.exe seems to
>have no problems with more
Hello,
I want to keep two prvious perl version available, now I need to know:
is more than one tag for 'prev:' or 'test:' in setup.hint files
supported and handled correct by upset? At least setup.exe seems to
have no problems with more than one [prev] tag in setup.ini.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
16 matches
Mail list logo