On 2016-01-21 04:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
does anything speak against switching Setup's license to GPLv3+?
If nobody complains, I'll bump to v3+ in a week or so.
Fine with me wrt my contributions.
--
Yaakov
On Jan 22 12:12, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/22/2016 11:57 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> > On Jan 22, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> > wrote:
> > I think you’d still have to get permission from all people who still
> > have code in the current setup.exe sources.
>
> Or rather, if a relicensing re
Warren Young writes:
>> I'm not trying to do that single-handedly and without reason. I'm
>> asking here to reach out to the current active developers. A switch
>> from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ works without having to reach out to *all*
>> copyright holder.
>
> I don’t think I agree with that.
"9. Each
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> does anything speak against switching Setup's license to GPLv3+?
> If nobody complains, I'll bump to v3+ in a week or so.
I have no problem with that.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Waldorf MIDI Implementation
On 01/22/2016 11:57 AM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 21 15:55, Warren Young wrote:
>>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 3:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen
>>> wrote:
does anything speak against switching Setup's license to GPLv3+?
If nobody
On Jan 22, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> On Jan 21 15:55, Warren Young wrote:
>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 3:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> does anything speak against switching Setup's license to GPLv3+?
>>> If nobody complains, I'll bump to v3+ in a week or so.
>>
>> Ca
On Jan 21 15:55, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2016, at 3:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> >
> > does anything speak against switching Setup's license to GPLv3+?
> > If nobody complains, I'll bump to v3+ in a week or so.
>
> Can you actually do that, legally? I thought the copyright
> ass
On Jan 21, 2016, at 3:49 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> does anything speak against switching Setup's license to GPLv3+?
> If nobody complains, I'll bump to v3+ in a week or so.
Can you actually do that, legally? I thought the copyright assignments only
applied to the DLL, not to setup.exe, s
Hi guys,
does anything speak against switching Setup's license to GPLv3+?
If nobody complains, I'll bump to v3+ in a week or so.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
sig