Contemplating ITP-ing apache 2. Wondering about layout.

2005-02-06 Thread Max Bowsher
I'm contemplating ITP-ing apache 2. It seems that practically every distribution has it's own favourite way to lay out directories of apache. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to deal with this? Max.

Re: Contemplating ITP-ing apache 2. Wondering about layout.

2005-02-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Max Bowsher wrote: I'm contemplating ITP-ing apache 2. It seems that practically every distribution has it's own favourite way to lay out directories of apache. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to deal with this? # Cygwin 1.x layout Layout Cygwin prefix: exec_prefix:

Re: Contemplating ITP-ing apache 2. Wondering about layout.

2005-02-06 Thread Charles Wilson
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: I'm contemplating ITP-ing apache 2. It seems that practically every distribution has it's own favourite way to lay out directories of apache. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to deal with this? # Cygwin 1.x layout Layout Cygwin prefix:

Re: Contemplating ITP-ing apache 2. Wondering about layout.

2005-02-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Charles Wilson wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: I'm contemplating ITP-ing apache 2. It seems that practically every distribution has it's own favourite way to lay out directories of apache. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to deal with this? [...Gerrit's Cygwin Apache