Download stats

2002-10-24 Thread William A. Hoffman
Just curious, are there any download stats kept for cygwin packages? -Bill

RE: Download stats

2002-10-24 Thread William A. Hoffman
TED] >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:30:38 -0400 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Download stats > > >Just curious, are there any download stats kept for cygwin packages? > >-Bill > > > >mail2web - Check your email from the web at >http://mail2web.com/ .

RE: Download stats

2002-10-24 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
t; > > >Larry > > > >Original Message: > >- > >From: William A. Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:30:38 -0400 > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Download stats >

Re: Download stats

2002-10-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:29:15PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >Oh, OK. That answer is also no. Are you sensing a pattern here? ;-) I'm sensing a certain vague menace; an underlying meanness, yes. cgf

Re: Download stats

2002-10-24 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
At 10:09 PM 10/24/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:29:15PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: > >Oh, OK. That answer is also no. Are you sensing a pattern here? ;-) > >I'm sensing a certain vague menace; an underlying meanness, yes. Excellent. Then I'm not

Re: Download stats

2002-10-24 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: At 10:09 PM 10/24/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:29:15PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: Oh, OK. That answer is also no. Are you sensing a pattern here? ;-) I'm sensing a certain vague menace; an underlying mean

Re: Download stats

2002-10-24 Thread Lapo Luchini
Nicholas Wourms wrote: Well I'm feeling charitable, so he goes for the reason why this isn't possible... Not so impossible.. iw would suffice a little PHP page on cygwin.com that setup.exe calls just after package selection, passing installed packages info in "post" 0=) (I don't think such a

package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Lapo Luchini
As a mere curiosity: would be possible to nkow how many times the packages are downloaded? (maybe grepping ftp/http logs) OK.. don't listen to me: of course the logs are on the mirrors =P -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
he answer to this, though. It would be nice (tm) if setup.exe could record download stats somewhere. But, then maybe that's a violation of privacy somehow. cgf

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
to me: of course the logs are on the mirrors =P > > I would love to know the answer to this, though. > > It would be nice (tm) if setup.exe could record download stats > somewhere. But, then maybe that's a violation of privacy somehow. > > cgf FWIW, every setup run make

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
oaded? (maybe grepping ftp/http logs) >>> >>>OK.. don't listen to me: of course the logs are on the mirrors =P >> >>I would love to know the answer to this, though. >> >>It would be nice (tm) if setup.exe could record download stats >>somewhere.

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
d be possible to nkow how many times the > >>>packages are downloaded? (maybe grepping ftp/http logs) > >>> > >>>OK.. don't listen to me: of course the logs are on the mirrors =P > >> > >>I would love to know the answer to this, though. &g

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:20:04AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> That's kind of what I was thinking. I could generate a cgi script to >> run, if necessary but obviously it would need some kind of >> authentication to avoid abuse. > >Hmm, I doubt

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:20:04AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> That's kind of what I was thinking. I could generate a cgi script to > >> run, if necessary but obviously it would need some k

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Lapo Luchini
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: But, seriously, I just wanted to make it less than trivial to use. It shouldn't be as easy as opening http://cygwin.com/downloadstats.cgi?apache to register an apache download. Yeah, who needs simple stuff? Although, actually, you do need a bit more than that -- at

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Christopher Faylor writes: > Actually, after I said that, I realized that we already gather page hit > statistics. I'm more interested in seeing what people actually are > downloading for packages, though. What people are actually using may be even more interesting. Do you know about Debian's e

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:56:14AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Although, actually, you do need a bit more than that -- at least the >version of the package and the mirror it was downloaded from, and it would >also be nice if all the packages were

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 01:11, Christopher Faylor wrote: > That's kind of what I was thinking. I could generate a cgi script to > run, if necessary but obviously it would need some kind of > authentication to avoid abuse. Is there something like this out there > somewhere? popularity-contest doe

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 00:56, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > FWIW, every setup run makes an http connection to cygwin.com (to get the > mirror list). Not anymore. It will take it from cache if it can. > We could also have setup connect *after* the download > (completely optionally, of course), and

Re: package download stats?

2003-09-18 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 03:18, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I'm all for adding this to setup but we'll have to wait for Robert to come > online to see his take on this. I'm not all that interested, though I will review patches for impact on setup. Clean design etc etc needed. It doesn't feel like