Re: FAQ entries about emacs

2009-02-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 23 14:41, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > Try this one: > > --- faq-using.xml.orig2009-02-22 20:36:51.078125000 +0100 > +++ faq-using.xml 2009-02-23 13:41:38.359375000 +0100 > @@ -806,13 +806,46 @@ Thanks! I've checked this in and uploaded it to http://cygwin.com/1.7/faq/faq.html C

Re: FAQ entries about emacs

2009-02-23 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Corinna Vinschen writes: > Thank you! Unfortunately I have a problem. The patch applies cleanly, > but the result doesn't build. The easy part was to fix the usage of > `&' in the screen sections, they just have to be converted to `&'. > But the really big problem is that

Re: FAQ entries about emacs

2009-02-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Volker, On Feb 22 21:37, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > Hi Volker, > > can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is > > there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT > > Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? T

Re: FAQ entries about emacs

2009-02-22 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Corinna Vinschen writes: > Hi Volker, > can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is > there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT > Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? The information given in these two FAQ > entries is certainly

Re: FAQ entries about emacs

2009-02-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 13 21:08, Jari Aalto wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR > Is there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs > > - Change URL to point to NT Emacs FAQ's entry 'Where can I get > pre-compiled versions' instead of direct FTP link. > > What about NT Emacs? >

Re: FAQ entries about emacs

2009-02-13 Thread Jari Aalto
Corinna Vinschen writes: > Hi Volker, > > can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is > there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT > Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? The information given in these two FAQ > entries is certainly outdated, but I'm not

Re: FAQ entries about emacs

2009-02-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 12 15:48, Steffen Sledz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen schrieb: > > can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is > > there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT > > Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? The information given in these two FAQ > > entries is

Re: FAQ entries about emacs

2009-02-12 Thread Steffen Sledz
Corinna Vinschen schrieb: > can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is > there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT > Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? The information given in these two FAQ > entries is certainly outdated, but I'm not quite sure how t

Re: FAQ entries about emacs

2009-02-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 12 15:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi Volker, > > can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is > there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT > Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? Urgh, there's a third one right afterwards called "What about XEmacs

FAQ entries about emacs

2009-02-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Volker, can you do me a favor? Can you have a look into the FAQ entries "Is there a Cygwin port of GNU Emacs?" and the next one "What about NT Emacs?" and suggest a rewrite? The information given in these two FAQ entries is certainly outdated, but I'm not quite sure how to rephrase them. What