On 2020-09-13 22:52, ASSI wrote:
> Brian Inglis writes:
>> Suggestions?
>
> Do you have all mingw64 packages installed that are required due to the
> configure statements? Add the necessary BUILD_REQUIRES so it gets
> checked. I haven't seen the log files you said were attached to some
>
Brian Inglis writes:
> Suggestions?
Do you have all mingw64 packages installed that are required due to the
configure statements? Add the necessary BUILD_REQUIRES so it gets
checked. I haven't seen the log files you said were attached to some
previous mail.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12
On 2020-09-07 15:00, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2020-09-07 12:58, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2020-09-07 08:04, Jon Turney wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2020 18:09, Brian Inglis wrote:
Hi folks,
Any ideas how to fix these complaints about nonexistent packages?
These mingw64 packages do not
On 2020-09-07 08:04, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 06/09/2020 18:09, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Any ideas how to fix these complaints about nonexistent packages?
>> These mingw64 packages do not yet have any DEPENDS/BUILD_REQUIRES but unsure
>> what if anything to add other than base with
On 06/09/2020 18:09, Brian Inglis wrote:
Hi folks,
Any ideas how to fix these complaints about nonexistent packages?
These mingw64 packages do not yet have any DEPENDS/BUILD_REQUIRES but unsure
what if anything to add other than base with cross tools.
ERROR: package 'mingw64-x86_64-curl'
Hi folks,
Any ideas how to fix these complaints about nonexistent packages?
These mingw64 packages do not yet have any DEPENDS/BUILD_REQUIRES but unsure
what if anything to add other than base with cross tools.
> ERROR: package 'mingw64-x86_64-curl' version '7.72.0-1' requires:
>
On 08/08/2018 05:27, Marco Atzeri wrote:
Am 07.08.2018 um 19:55 schrieb Marco Atzeri:
Jon,
it seems that the upload of guile2.0 am guile-2.2
need a manual intervention
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: calm: cygwin package upload report from sourceware.org for
Marco Atzeri
Am 07.08.2018 um 19:55 schrieb Marco Atzeri:
Jon,
it seems that the upload of guile2.0 am guile-2.2
need a manual intervention
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: calm: cygwin package upload report from sourceware.org for
Marco Atzeri
Datum: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 17:35:06 -
Jon,
it seems that the upload of guile2.0 am guile-2.2
need a manual intervention
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: calm: cygwin package upload report from sourceware.org for
Marco Atzeri
Datum: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 17:35:06 -
ERROR: package 'libguile2.0-devel' is at paths
On 18/11/2016 17:37, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
On 18 November 2016 at 12:18, Jon Turney wrote:
On 18/11/2016 16:47, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
I've uploaded a new mksh build using the recently released cygport (v
0.23) and it seems like something isn't playing nice with the "upload"
command and
On 18 November 2016 at 12:18, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 18/11/2016 16:47, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>
>> I've uploaded a new mksh build using the recently released cygport (v
>> 0.23) and it seems like something isn't playing nice with the "upload"
>> command and calm:
>>
> [...]
>>
>>
>> Did I miss
On 18/11/2016 16:47, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
Hi All,
I've uploaded a new mksh build using the recently released cygport (v
0.23) and it seems like something isn't playing nice with the "upload"
command and calm:
[...]
Did I miss something in terms of a needed update to the mksh.cygport file?
Hi All,
I've uploaded a new mksh build using the recently released cygport (v
0.23) and it seems like something isn't playing nice with the "upload"
command and calm:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: 18 November 2016 at 11:41
Subject: calm: cygwin package upload report from
On 30/07/2016 14:15, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 30/07/2016 13:47, Jon Turney wrote:
But that's not usually appropriate for an old soversion of a shared
library (even though it has no users left in the distro, there may be
3rd party packages or local builds which depend on the old soversion),
so it
On 30/07/2016 13:47, Jon Turney wrote:
On 30/07/2016 05:45, Marco Atzeri wrote:
I have some problem to remove the obsolete versions
The usual trick before was to remove all
x86/release/ImageMagick/-ImageMagick-6.9.0.0-4-src.tar.xz
On 30/07/2016 05:45, Marco Atzeri wrote:
I have some problem to remove the obsolete versions
The usual trick before was to remove all
x86/release/ImageMagick/-ImageMagick-6.9.0.0-4-src.tar.xz
x86/release/ImageMagick/libMagickC++6_5/-libMagickC++6_5-6.9.0.0-4.tar.xz
16 matches
Mail list logo
