ITP?: aspell-it-0.53.0-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 How does it work regarding aspell? Should every language be packaged together or every single language by a different mantainer? Well, in case it is the second case, I propose to manage the italian files. BTW: will aspell be upgraded soon from 0.50 t

Re: ITP?: aspell-it-0.53.0-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lapo Luchini wrote: > http://www.lapo.it/cygwin/aspell-it-0.53.0-1.tar.bz2 BTW: is it "usual" that a language file is so big? - -rw-r--r-- lapo/None 39342080 2005-08-18 18:29:07 usr/lib/aspell/it.rws ...i noticed that the english one is much smaller

Re: ITP?: aspell-it-0.53.0-1

Lapo Luchini wrote in : How does it work regarding aspell? Should every language be packaged together or every single language by a different mantainer? Well, in case it is the second case, I propose to manage the italian files. Mhh

Re: ITP?: aspell-it-0.53.0-1

On Jan 2 00:08, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Lapo Luchini wrote in > : > >How does it work regarding aspell? Should every language be packaged > >together or every single language by a different mantainer? > > > >Well, in case it is the second

Re: ITP?: aspell-it-0.53.0-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> How does it work regarding aspell? Should every language be >>> packaged together or every single language by a different >>> mantainer? >>> >>> Well, in case it is the second case, I propose to manage the >>> italian files.

Re: ITP?: aspell-it-0.53.0-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lapo Luchini wrote: > What about the question in my own reply? > I report it here in case some one knows aspell better than me: > > Is it "usual" that a language file is so big? > 39342080 2005-08-18 18:29:07 usr/lib/aspell/it.rws > (it.cwl is 5.3MiB