-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Bowsher wrote:
I personally have no need for PHP, but I know it's a very widely
used piece of software.
After John Morrison's recent mention of PHP in passing, I decided
to do a quick estimate of how difficult getting PHP working on
Cygwin
Robert Richter wrote:
I didn't really intend to package PHP, but having got this far, I sort of
feel I ought to.
Which brings me to two major issues concerning any potential Cygwin PHP
package:
1) Two apache versions.
I've no interest in Apache 1.3.x. Can I just package PHP for 2.x, and
worry
On Sun, September 18, 2005 10:05 pm, Max Bowsher wrote:
I personally have no need for PHP, but I know it's a very widely used
piece of software.
After John Morrison's recent mention of PHP in passing, I decided to do a
quick estimate of how difficult getting PHP working on Cygwin would be. To
I personally have no need for PHP, but I know it's a very widely used piece
of software.
After John Morrison's recent mention of PHP in passing, I decided to do a
quick estimate of how difficult getting PHP working on Cygwin would be. To
cut a long story short, I got a bit carried away, and
Max Bowsher wrote:
2) Shared library headaches.
PHP definitely needs its postgresql support available to be useful most
non-trivial application. If I want to avoid creating a hard dependency
on the postgresql package, the PHP pgsql extension needs to be built as
a shared library. But to
