Re: Naming convention for versioned libraries

2017-06-12 Thread Ken Brown
On 6/12/2017 1:15 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2017-06-11 13:13, Ken Brown wrote: I'm about to ITP geomview, which will include a library package containing DLLs of the form cyg*-1-9-5.dll. Should the package be called libgeomview1_9_5 or libgeomview_1_9_5? I see both conventions in the di

Re: Naming convention for versioned libraries

2017-06-12 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2017-06-11 13:13, Ken Brown wrote: I'm about to ITP geomview, which will include a library package containing DLLs of the form cyg*-1-9-5.dll. Should the package be called libgeomview1_9_5 or libgeomview_1_9_5? I see both conventions in the distro. libgeomview1.9.5 But, is this really a

Naming convention for versioned libraries

2017-06-11 Thread Ken Brown
I'm about to ITP geomview, which will include a library package containing DLLs of the form cyg*-1-9-5.dll. Should the package be called libgeomview1_9_5 or libgeomview_1_9_5? I see both conventions in the distro. Ken