Re: New GMP and MPFR packages for review

2006-11-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 9 09:02, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote: From: Corinna Vinschen I'm not using this so I can't test. The packaging looks good. But I don't think the gmp package should have libgmp-devel in its requirements. This contradicts the purpose of differing between runtime

RE: New GMP and MPFR packages for review

2006-11-08 Thread Billinghurst, David \(CALCRTS\)
From: Corinna Vinschen I'm not using this so I can't test. The packaging looks good. But I don't think the gmp package should have libgmp-devel in its requirements. This contradicts the purpose of differing between runtime and devel packages. The devel package should only be

Re: New GMP and MPFR packages for review

2006-11-07 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 6 14:13, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote: http://billinghurst.customer.netspace.net.au/cygwin/gmp/gmp-4.2.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://billinghurst.customer.netspace.net.au/cygwin/gmp/gmp-4.2.1-1.tar.bz2 http://billinghurst.customer.netspace.net.au/cygwin/gmp/setup.hint

New GMP and MPFR packages for review

2006-11-05 Thread Billinghurst, David \(CALCRTS\)
The current cygwin version of gmp is 4.1.4. This also contains an old version of mpfr. The latest version of gmp is 4.2.1 It no longer contains it own version of mpfr. I have packaged gmp-4.2.1 and mpfr-2.2.0. The current gmp maintainer Lapo Luchini is happy for me to offer these for review