On Nov 9 09:02, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
From: Corinna Vinschen
I'm not using this so I can't test. The packaging looks good. But I don't
think
the gmp package should have libgmp-devel in its requirements. This
contradicts the
purpose of differing between runtime
From: Corinna Vinschen
I'm not using this so I can't test. The packaging looks good. But I don't
think
the gmp package should have libgmp-devel in its requirements. This
contradicts the
purpose of differing between runtime and devel packages. The devel package
should
only be
On Nov 6 14:13, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
http://billinghurst.customer.netspace.net.au/cygwin/gmp/gmp-4.2.1-1-src.tar.bz2
http://billinghurst.customer.netspace.net.au/cygwin/gmp/gmp-4.2.1-1.tar.bz2
http://billinghurst.customer.netspace.net.au/cygwin/gmp/setup.hint
The current cygwin version of gmp is 4.1.4. This also contains an old version
of mpfr. The latest version of gmp is 4.2.1 It no longer contains it own
version
of mpfr. I have packaged gmp-4.2.1 and mpfr-2.2.0. The current gmp maintainer
Lapo Luchini is happy for me to offer these for review