On 2010-11-03, at 21:36, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:23 +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
In the meantime, I think that ocaml, ccache and distcc should remove gcc
from their setup.hint lines, and perhaps replace it by gcc-core.
BTW: both 'ccache' and
Damien Doligez wrote:
I never received Dave's message, so I'm missing some context here, but
the latest ocaml (3.12.0-4) actually depends on gcc4-core, not on any
flavor of gcc 3.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/103106/focus=18420
It's fairly old, but yes, I was stating that onlt
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:36:40PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Damien Doligez wrote:
I never received Dave's message, so I'm missing some context here, but
the latest ocaml (3.12.0-4) actually depends on gcc4-core, not on any
flavor of gcc 3.
Dave Korn wrote:
In the meantime, I think that ocaml, ccache and distcc should remove gcc
from their setup.hint lines, and perhaps replace it by gcc-core.
BTW: both 'ccache' and 'distcc' are depending on 'gcc' in latest
setup.ini (I'm trying to avoid gcc-3 on my fresh install).
--
Lapo
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:23 +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
In the meantime, I think that ocaml, ccache and distcc should remove gcc
from their setup.hint lines, and perhaps replace it by gcc-core.
BTW: both 'ccache' and 'distcc' are depending on 'gcc' in latest
setup.ini
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
BTW: both 'ccache' and 'distcc' are depending on 'gcc' in latest
setup.ini (I'm trying to avoid gcc-3 on my fresh install).
Then shouldn't that be 'gcc4-core'?
I'm not sure there should be a dependency at all: ccache doesn't depend
on any compiler, it will just call
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I've made the change but I wonder if I should just remove ccache from
the distro. I have never heard that anyone is using it.
Here I am!
--
Lapo Luchini - http://lapo.it/
“Real Programmers always confuse Christmas and Halloween because Oct31
== Dec25.” (Andrew
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:55:38PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I've made the change but I wonder if I should just remove ccache from
the distro. I have never heard that anyone is using it.
Here I am!
Yes. I get it:
Christopher Faylor cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com writes:
I've made the change but I wonder if I should just remove ccache from
the distro. I have never heard that anyone is using it.
Please don't.
I speeds up compiling. I use it all the time.
Jari
Eric Blake wrote:
According to Andrew Schulman on 1/9/2009 7:42 AM:
Subject says it all. setup sees the package as new, and reinstalls it, every
time.
Is this a known problem? I didn't see any other reports of it. Is there a
simple fix or workaround?
The package is a source-only
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:54:30PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
According to Andrew Schulman on 1/9/2009 7:42 AM:
Subject says it all. setup sees the package as new, and reinstalls it,
every time.
Is this a known problem? I didn't see any other reports of it. Is
there a simple fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Christopher Faylor on 3/30/2009 7:47 PM:
I've made the change but I wonder if I should just remove ccache from
the distro. I have never heard that anyone is using it.
I use it in some of my build trees, although I have never really
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:06:04PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
According to Christopher Faylor on 3/30/2009 7:47 PM:
I've made the change but I wonder if I should just remove ccache from
the distro. I have never heard that anyone is using it.
I use it in some of my build trees, although I have
Eric Blake wrote:
According to Christopher Faylor on 3/30/2009 7:47 PM:
I've made the change but I wonder if I should just remove ccache from
the distro. I have never heard that anyone is using it.
I use it in some of my build trees, although I have never really measured
how much (if any)
14 matches
Mail list logo
