Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-04 Thread Charles R. Hardnett
Hi, I would like to maintain the xcoral package. The source is found at http://xcoral.free.fr The port has been done, but I am having one trouble with the package creation. To make the port, I had to move files to a different directory. For example "control.h" was moved to "lowercase/

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-04 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hello Charles, > I would like to maintain the xcoral package. The source is found at +1 vote from me. > http://xcoral.free.fr > The port has been done, but I am having one trouble with the package > creation. To make the port, I had to move files to a different directory. > For example "cont

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-04 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Charles R. Hardnett wrote: Hi, I would like to maintain the xcoral package. The source is found at http://xcoral.free.fr +1 from me. Harold

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-05 Thread Reini Urban
Charles R. Hardnett schrieb: I would like to maintain the xcoral package. The source is found at +1 -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-05 Thread Charles R. Hardnett
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral Hello Charles, > I would like to maintain the xcoral package. The source is found at +1 vote from me. > http://xcoral.free.fr > The port has been done, but I am having one

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-05 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hello Charles, > > [snip] > > The port has been done, but I am having one trouble with the package > > creation. To make the port, I had to move files to a different directory. > > For example "control.h" was moved to "lowercase/control.h" to avoid the

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-05 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hello Igor, >> Use managed mounts to avoid renaming. > Please don't, at least not for the final package. I'd be very wary of > putting packages into the distribution that would require managed mounts > to build. Why? You can handle the build from a buildscript including mounting and umounting

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-05 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hello Igor, > > >> Use managed mounts to avoid renaming. > > > Please don't, at least not for the final package. I'd be very wary of > > putting packages into the distribution that would require managed mounts > > to build. > > Why? You can handle the

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-05 Thread Charles R. Hardnett
win-apps To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: "Charles R. Hardnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hello Charles, > > [snip] > > The port has been done, but I am

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 01:29:33PM -0400, Charles R. Hardnett wrote: >I was just playing with the managed mounts and they don't seem stable. Huh? What is wrong with managed mounts? Please send a bug report to the cygwin list. cgf

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-05 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hello Igor, >> Why? > I'm thinking of some people who'd want to use non-Cygwin tools to look at > and debug the package source. NTEmacs comes to mind. This is not a Cygwin application and I don't want to support it. And besides that, you can still look at the source, though you should know how

Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral

2004-10-05 Thread Charles R. Hardnett
D]> Subject:Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hello Charles, > > [snip] > > The port has been done, but I am having one trouble with the package > > creation. To make the port, I had to move files to a different directory