Hi,
I would like to maintain the xcoral package. The source is found at
http://xcoral.free.fr
The port has been done, but I am having one trouble with the package
creation. To make the port, I had to move files to a different directory.
For example "control.h" was moved to "lowercase/
Hello Charles,
> I would like to maintain the xcoral package. The source is found at
+1 vote from me.
> http://xcoral.free.fr
> The port has been done, but I am having one trouble with the package
> creation. To make the port, I had to move files to a different directory.
> For example "cont
Charles R. Hardnett wrote:
Hi,
I would like to maintain the xcoral package. The source is found at
http://xcoral.free.fr
+1 from me.
Harold
Charles R. Hardnett schrieb:
I would like to maintain the xcoral package. The source is found at
+1
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral
Hello Charles,
> I would like to maintain the xcoral package. The source is found at
+1 vote from me.
> http://xcoral.free.fr
> The port has been done, but I am having one
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> [snip]
> > The port has been done, but I am having one trouble with the package
> > creation. To make the port, I had to move files to a different directory.
> > For example "control.h" was moved to "lowercase/control.h" to avoid the
Hello Igor,
>> Use managed mounts to avoid renaming.
> Please don't, at least not for the final package. I'd be very wary of
> putting packages into the distribution that would require managed mounts
> to build.
Why? You can handle the build from a buildscript including mounting
and umounting
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Hello Igor,
>
> >> Use managed mounts to avoid renaming.
>
> > Please don't, at least not for the final package. I'd be very wary of
> > putting packages into the distribution that would require managed mounts
> > to build.
>
> Why? You can handle the
win-apps
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: "Charles R. Hardnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> [snip]
> > The port has been done, but I am
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 01:29:33PM -0400, Charles R. Hardnett wrote:
>I was just playing with the managed mounts and they don't seem stable.
Huh? What is wrong with managed mounts?
Please send a bug report to the cygwin list.
cgf
Hello Igor,
>> Why?
> I'm thinking of some people who'd want to use non-Cygwin tools to look at
> and debug the package source. NTEmacs comes to mind.
This is not a Cygwin application and I don't want to support it. And
besides that, you can still look at the source, though you should know
how
D]>
Subject:Re: Package Proposal: Xcoral
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> [snip]
> > The port has been done, but I am having one trouble with the package
> > creation. To make the port, I had to move files to a different
directory
12 matches
Mail list logo