Re: Packaging glitch [1.7] md5sum binutils-2.19.51-1-src.tar.bz2

2009-10-09 Thread Dave Korn
Dave Korn wrote: BTW, before jumping clumsily in with my dirty great size 9s, I did also download the -src tarball with the dubious checksum and verify it (by diffing against a recent cvs checkout) to make sure it hadn't *actually* been tampered with; I didn't spot any suspicious insertions.

Re: Packaging glitch [1.7] md5sum binutils-2.19.51-1-src.tar.bz2

2009-10-09 Thread Dave Korn
Christopher Faylor wrote: > PLEASE don't tinker with the release directories, especially in an > attempt to fix my packages. Understood, sorry, won't do that again. The original md5.sum is in my ~/ if you need it for anything. The time stamp reads "Jul 5 02:01" which I think is the only poss

Re: Packaging glitch [1.7] md5sum binutils-2.19.51-1-src.tar.bz2

2009-10-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 04:49:09PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Dave Korn wrote: >> Fergus wrote: >>> Downloaded from two different mirrors this file has md5sum >>> 479d8f95c1306486af1adcb5a2ad54b1 >>> but setup-2.ini gives >>> c3887f0ef36cc78c51c54abca9b4425a >>> The file size 15536137 is correct. >>

Re: Packaging glitch [1.7] md5sum binutils-2.19.51-1-src.tar.bz2

2009-10-09 Thread Dave Korn
Dave Korn wrote: > Fergus wrote: >> Downloaded from two different mirrors this file has md5sum >> 479d8f95c1306486af1adcb5a2ad54b1 >> but setup-2.ini gives >> c3887f0ef36cc78c51c54abca9b4425a >> The file size 15536137 is correct. > > > Yes indeed. Looks like fallout from: > > http://cygwin.co