Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
I'm working on packaging rtorrent for Cygwin. To that end it requires libtorrent and libsigc++. My question is, for libtorrent and libsigc++, I need to split the dll and the developer packages (obviously), but do I also need to split the devel package and separate out the documentation? For

Re: Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 5 10:34, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I'm working on packaging rtorrent for Cygwin. To that end it requires libtorrent and libsigc++. My question is, for libtorrent and libsigc++, I need to split the dll and the developer packages (obviously), but do I also need to split the devel package

Re: Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:34:38AM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I'm working on packaging rtorrent for Cygwin. To that end it requires libtorrent and libsigc++. My question is, for libtorrent and libsigc++, I need to split the dll and the developer packages (obviously), but do I also need to

Re: Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 5 August 2010 11:44, Christopher Faylor wrote: I like the idea of separating the documentation but not every package does this so whatever you decide is ok with me unless someone else has a compelling argument either way. I'm working on following the libtheora model:

Re: Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 5 August 2010 12:02, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I'm working on following the libtheora model: libsigc++-2.2.8-1.tar.bz2 (documentation) libsigc++0-2.2.8-1.tar.bz2 (runtime) libsigc++-devel-2.2.8-1.tar.bz2 (development) I've made good progress with libsgic++, but libtorrent is giving me grief

Re: Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/5/2010 3:09 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: libtool: link: warning: undefined symbols not allowed in i686-pc-cygwin shared libraries but I can't find any output from libtool to tell me what symbols are undefined. Is there a way to find out what libtool is complaining about? There may not

Re: Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 12:02 -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I'm working on following the libtheora model: libsigc++-2.2.8-1.tar.bz2 (documentation) libsigc++0-2.2.8-1.tar.bz2 (runtime) libsigc++-devel-2.2.8-1.tar.bz2 (development) Please API-version these, as there have been several

Re: Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Hi Yaakov, On 5 August 2010 16:43, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Please API-version these, as there have been several parallel-installable APIs of libsigc++.  Feel free to borrow from Ports: http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/ports;a=tree;f=libs/libsigc%2B%2B2.0

Re: Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 20:44 -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I've made some minor modifications to your packaging: ORIG_PN=libsigc++ inherit gtkmm HOMEPAGE=http://libsigc.sourceforge.net/; SRC_URI=http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libsigc++/2.2/${ORIG_PN}-${PV}.tar.bz2; gtkmm.cygclass

Re: Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 15:09 -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I've made good progress with libsgic++, but libtorrent is giving me grief in that it refuses to build the shared target (static is fine). What I get is: libtool: link: warning: undefined symbols not allowed in i686-pc-cygwin shared

Re: Packaging of libraries

2010-08-05 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 5 August 2010 22:42, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: This should get you started: http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/ports;a=tree;f=net/libtorrent I just built it; I made no attempt to test its functionality. Excellent, thank you Yaakov! Chris -- Chris

Re: gcc-3.2 C++ ABI and packaging c++ libraries [was Re: [ITP]: Berkeley DB v3.1]

2002-07-26 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 07:59:06AM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: Now this package's c++ library has been compiled with g++-2 since libtool refuses to link to libstc++.la in the new g++-3.1.1-4. This certain someone suggested that I rebuild the proposed packages with only the C libraries

Re: gcc-3.2 C++ ABI and packaging c++ libraries [was Re: [ITP]: Berkeley DB v3.1]

2002-07-26 Thread Gareth Pearce
- Original Message - From: Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 12:04 AM Subject: Re: gcc-3.2 C++ ABI and packaging c++ libraries [was Re: [ITP]: Berkeley DB v3.1] Gareth Pearce wrote: B)If possible, I'd like to know what