Harold,
The upload references from your original proposal message have
apparently been taken down (404 Not Found).
Is the work you had done up to this time available anywhere, or
should I go back to the SourceForge originals?
NO PROMISES IMPLIED, but I'd like to take a look.
Harold L
Package: otcl 1.0.9-1 [2003-10-29]
Description: OTcl, short for MIT Object Tcl. (main package)
Also: libotcl0 [OTcl, short for MIT Object Tcl. (runtime)]
Also: libotcl-devel [OTcl, short for MIT Object Tcl. (development)]
Proposal: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-10/msg004
> From: Christopher Faylor
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:36:43PM -, John Morrison wrote:
> >>From: Christopher Faylor
> >>I don't know. I think I like Igor's more draconian approach better. I
> >>might even go so far as to say that there should be only one ITP at a
> >>time unless there is
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:36:43PM -, John Morrison wrote:
>>From: Christopher Faylor
>>I don't know. I think I like Igor's more draconian approach better. I
>>might even go so far as to say that there should be only one ITP at a
>>time unless there is a demonstrated need for other interrelat
> From: Christopher Faylor
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 01:59:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >|I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
> >|issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
> >|are addressed or the pa
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I am wondering if we should have some different voting rules, too. I
have previously gone on record as thinking that the three vote rule
is too easy. Maybe we need a representative council or something.
I'd like to point out that people who start to think about contri
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 01:59:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>|I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
>|issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
>|are addressed or the package is withdrawn.
>
>I understand y
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> | I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
> | issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
> | are addressed or the package is withdrawn.
> | Igor
>
> I understan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
| I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
| issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
| are addressed or the package is withdrawn.
| Igor
I understand your thinkin
To help clean up the ITP list, I've been working on this for a while. It
is possible to get something which mostly works by simply compiling
everything under cygwin (and this is actually how the offical windows
distribution works). There are however quite a large number of
additional libraries
This is the list of pending packages as of Saturday, March 13, 2004. If
you see something amiss, please let the list know.
I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
are addressed or the package is w
11 matches
Mail list logo
