Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 02:24:25PM -0400, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
>This is a test version because there is one "debug" output remaining. The
>conditions for it should basically never happen, but as long as it's
there,
>I don't think this should become canonical.
>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 02:24:25PM -0400, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've rolled up a new *test* version of Bash: bash-2.05b-17. Here's the info:
>
>c71afc4cde07a18868d76f3a19b75c34 *bash-2.05b-17-src.tar.bz2
>7c2f962718bf072af97ad505116cfaa8 *bash-2.05b-17.tar.bz2
>
>http://rlc.unsa
Hello,
I've rolled up a new *test* version of Bash: bash-2.05b-17. Here's the info:
c71afc4cde07a18868d76f3a19b75c34 *bash-2.05b-17-src.tar.bz2
7c2f962718bf072af97ad505116cfaa8 *bash-2.05b-17.tar.bz2
http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/bash-2.05b-17-src.tar.bz2
http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/bash-2.05b-17.tar.bz2
Thi