Re: Proposal to add and maintain the epstool package

2005-01-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:41:37PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> The format of setup.ini is easy enough to understand. You don't need a >> special program to test this. >> > >OK, you have to use unix style path separators - I figured t

Re: Proposal to add and maintain the epstool package

2005-01-07 Thread antiskid56-cygwin
--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The format of setup.ini is easy enough to understand. You don't need a > special program to test this. > OK, you have to use unix style path separators - I figured that out, so setup.ini parses successfully. I got the file sizes and the m

Re: Proposal to add and maintain the epstool package

2005-01-07 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am interested in becoming a package maintainer for the package epstool. You may be interested to take a look at the version taht was packaged by Charles Wilson: http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/testing/ADOPT-ME/epstool/ Gerrit -- =^..^=

Re: Proposal to add and maintain the epstool package

2005-01-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:20:50PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I have source and binary packages available, but am unable to test >setup.hint due to the non-availability of upset. The format of setup.ini is easy enough to understand. You don't need a special program to test this.

Proposal to add and maintain the epstool package

2005-01-07 Thread antiskid56-cygwin
Hi, I am interested in becoming a package maintainer for the package epstool. The current version of upstream is located at ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ghost/ghostgum/epstool-3.06.tar.gz epstool is GPL'ed, and is available in Debian. I have source and binary packages available, but am