Re: Proposal to add and maintain the w3m package

2005-02-28 Thread Jason Tishler
Bod, On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 10:13:53AM -0500, Bob Heckel wrote: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:17:20 -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > BTW, when did w3m become dependent on the above? I've been using > > w3m for a long time and never noticed this dependency. However, I > > haven't built a version since

Re: Proposal to add and maintain the w3m package

2005-02-27 Thread Bob Heckel
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:15:59 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 09:15:13AM -0500, Bob Heckel wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:20:33PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:32:20PM -0500, Bob Heckel wrote: > >> >Here are preliminary setup.hint's

Re: Proposal to add and maintain the w3m package

2005-02-27 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 09:15:13AM -0500, Bob Heckel wrote: >On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:20:33PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:32:20PM -0500, Bob Heckel wrote: >> >Here are preliminary setup.hint's >> > >> >@ w3m >> >> Can you explain what in the documentation sugge

Re: Proposal to add and maintain the w3m package

2005-02-27 Thread Bob Heckel
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:17:20 -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > BTW, when did w3m become dependent on the above? I've been using w3m > for a long time and never noticed this dependency. However, I haven't > built a version since 0.3.2.2+cvs-1.697 (i.e., from CVS after 0.3.2.2 > but before 0.4). I am

Re: Proposal to add and maintain the w3m package

2005-02-27 Thread Jason Tishler
Bob, On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:32:20PM -0500, Bob Heckel wrote: > Based on suggestions from http://cygwin.com/setup.html, I'm announcing > my willingness to be the package maintainer for the w3m browser > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/w3m). I haven't found any mention of > an existing w3m pac

Re: Proposal to add and maintain the w3m package

2005-02-27 Thread Bob Heckel
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:20:33PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:32:20PM -0500, Bob Heckel wrote: > >Here are preliminary setup.hint's > > > >@ w3m > > Can you explain what in the documentation suggested to you that you > needed to use this "@ w3m" tag? I have read

Re: Proposal to add and maintain the w3m package

2005-02-26 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Bob Heckel wrote: > Hi, > > Based on suggestions from http://cygwin.com/setup.html, I'm > announcing my willingness to be the package maintainer for the w3m > browser (http://sourceforge.net/projects/w3m). Good for you. It might be a good idea to also say how w3m compares to

Re: Proposal to add and maintain the w3m package

2005-02-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:32:20PM -0500, Bob Heckel wrote: >Here are preliminary setup.hint's > >@ w3m Can you explain what in the documentation suggested to you that you needed to use this "@ w3m" tag? I have read the setup.html web page repeatedly and it seems really clear to me that it isn't

Proposal to add and maintain the w3m package

2005-02-26 Thread Bob Heckel
Hi, Based on suggestions from http://cygwin.com/setup.html, I'm announcing my willingness to be the package maintainer for the w3m browser (http://sourceforge.net/projects/w3m). I haven't found any mention of an existing w3m package in any Cygwin mailing list nor web searches. I'm a long-time Cy