Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: For those that may be interested in adoption, there are updated versions of some of these now in Ports: Okay, thanks for the leg up. I'm guessing you'll keep maintaining these packages? I started my versions from yours, but had to remove several features

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Brian Dessent
Warren Young wrote: Yes, but the package name changed, so I think all I have to do is ensure the RFU request says to leave libexpat0 alone, right? Then other package maintainers can rebuild for libexpat1 at their leisure. Unless, that is, it's a big deal to port to expat 2? There's more to

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Warren Young
Brian Dessent wrote: Otherwise, you potentially violate the GPL licensing requirement to provide the source as it would disappear from the mirrors entirely as new 'foo' versions pushed the old one off. So what I need to do, then, is rebuild the 1.95.8 package so it _only_ builds the DLL

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Brian Dessent
Warren Young wrote: Otherwise, you potentially violate the GPL licensing requirement to provide the source as it would disappear from the mirrors entirely as new 'foo' versions pushed the old one off. So what I need to do, then, is rebuild the 1.95.8 package so it _only_ builds the DLL

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Charles Wilson
Warren Young wrote: Brian Dessent wrote: Otherwise, you potentially violate the GPL licensing requirement to provide the source as it would disappear from the mirrors entirely as new 'foo' versions pushed the old one off. So what I need to do, then, is rebuild the 1.95.8 package so it _only_

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-05-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Warren Young wrote: Then other package maintainers can rebuild for libexpat1 at their leisure. Unless, that is, it's a big deal to port to expat 2? I believe it's merely a matter of rebuilding. Max. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 29 22:34, Eric Blake wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Max Bowsher on 4/29/2008 4:47 PM: | Accordingly I'm putting my packages up for adoption: | | * patchutils I use this enough to warrant adopting it. I'll post an ITA soon (although since

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-30 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Wed, April 30, 2008 3:27 am, Corinna Vinschen wrote: According to Max Bowsher on 4/29/2008 4:47 PM: | Farewell, of sorts, and thanks everyone for helping make Windows a nice | place to be the past many years! Sad ACK. I've marked all your packages as orphaned now. Would not a farewell

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 30 04:20, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: On Wed, April 30, 2008 3:27 am, Corinna Vinschen wrote: According to Max Bowsher on 4/29/2008 4:47 PM: | Farewell, of sorts, and thanks everyone for helping make Windows a nice | place to be the past many years! Sad ACK. I've marked all

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-30 Thread Warren Young
Max Bowsher wrote: * doxygen I'm interested, contingent on seeing what it takes to build it. * expat I can do this one, but I'm concerned because expat.sf.net isn't responding right now. Did expat die again while I wasn't looking? * sqlite3 I know very little about using SQLite

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-30 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 For those that may be interested in adoption, there are updated versions of some of these now in Ports: | * apr1 aprutil1 http://cygwin-ports.cvs.sourceforge.net/cygwin-ports/ports/libs/apr1/

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-30 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Warren Young wrote: Please email me the package build scripts, and brief instructions on their use. I maintain the ctags package, but do so with hand-rolled tools due to weirdnesses of its build system. So, I know how to build Cygwin packages, but I don't know how to

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-30 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Max Bowsher writes: * neon Will take this one, it's needed by cadaver. Ciao Volker

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-30 Thread Max Bowsher
Warren Young wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: * doxygen I'm interested, contingent on seeing what it takes to build it. It's a most bizarre and quirky buildsystem that I've never seen any other package use. * expat I can do this one, but I'm concerned because expat.sf.net isn't responding

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-30 Thread David Rothenberger
On 4/30/2008 3:45 PM, Max Bowsher wrote: Warren Young wrote: All my packages are generic-build-script based. I *think* that the base g-b-s version for each should be as follows: apache2, apr1, aprutil1, subversion: CVS r1.47 I have a .cygport for subversion-1.4.6 if anyone's interested. I'm

Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-29 Thread Max Bowsher
. Accordingly I'm putting my packages up for adoption: * apache2 * apr1 aprutil1 * doxygen * expat * neon * patchutils * sqlite3 * subversion * swig I'll be keeping an eye on the list, if people want to ask any questions about the packages, and until adopters can be found I may still manage

Re: Putting my packages up for adoption

2008-04-29 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Max Bowsher on 4/29/2008 4:47 PM: | Accordingly I'm putting my packages up for adoption: | | * patchutils I use this enough to warrant adopting it. I'll post an ITA soon (although since it hasn't changed upstream, I'm not sure what