Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-23 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello, Corinna. Friday, August 22, 2014, 16:49:31 you wrote: > src_install () { > cd ${B} > cyginstall > } > This is the default behaviour when running > cygport rpcbind.cygport install > But it also doesn't hurt, so GTG. Fixed and uploaded. -- Kind regards, Pave

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 20 22:22, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > I have completed rpcbind package and would like to offer it for the > upload. > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ah2v9q1we8wl1oe/AACHiGJcCp6-oBrL2KEn7E7Wa?dl=0 > The same as onc-rpc-devel, this is x86-64-only for now. Looks good. Btw., I think ou can

RE: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-22 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello! I have updated the package. UID check is still #ifdef'ed out because Yaakov's library is not released yet. Additionally, i believe that some additional code is perhaps a good solution for large complex projects, but this one is too simple. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Sam

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 21 20:47, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > Procps only for sysctl, and sysctl is not working on Cygwin anyway. > > I'll create a new procps package which omits sysctl entirely. > > Great, thank you. > > > As for sysvinit (and potential others), I'm not exactly keen to add

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: > Procps only for sysctl, and sysctl is not working on Cygwin anyway. > I'll create a new procps package which omits sysctl entirely. Great, thank you. > As for sysvinit (and potential others), I'm not exactly keen to add > another hardcoded mount /usr/sbin -> /sbin or so

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 21 18:53, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > We can (and maybe should) consider to add /usr/sbin to $PATH by default > > in /etc/profile, but that's a discussion concerning the base-files > > package in the first place. > > Only root should have it in PATH otherwise you could

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: > We can (and maybe should) consider to add /usr/sbin to $PATH by default > in /etc/profile, but that's a discussion concerning the base-files > package in the first place. Only root should have it in PATH otherwise you could just install everything in /usr/bin and forget

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 21 19:58, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello, Corinna. > > Thursday, August 21, 2014, 19:08:58 you wrote: > > > That's a generic installation problem, not a problem of your package. > > Yes, may be, however this doesn't give any answer to: how will we > solve this particular problem right no

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello, Corinna. Thursday, August 21, 2014, 19:08:58 you wrote: > That's a generic installation problem, not a problem of your package. Yes, may be, however this doesn't give any answer to: how will we solve this particular problem right now ? There are variants: 1. I leave rpcinfo in /usr/b

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 21 18:58, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello, Yaakov. > > Thursday, August 21, 2014, 6:04:38 you wrote: > > > These are in /usr/sbin on Fedora, so in this particular case: > > > cyginstall bindir=/usr/sbin > > By the way, i just have noticed that Cygwin actually doesn't have > /usr/sbin. A

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 21 18:42, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello, Corinna. > > Wednesday, August 20, 2014, 23:14:35 you wrote: > > > Packaging looks good, basically, but the executables are in /usr/bin, > > while on Linux they are in /usr/sbin. Would you mind to move them? > > No, i don't mind. I will. > > > Btw.

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello, Yaakov. Thursday, August 21, 2014, 6:04:38 you wrote: > These are in /usr/sbin on Fedora, so in this particular case: > cyginstall bindir=/usr/sbin By the way, i just have noticed that Cygwin actually doesn't have /usr/sbin. At least we don't have it in $PATH by default. For th

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello, Yaakov. Thursday, August 21, 2014, 6:04:38 you wrote: > I'm wondering if onc-rpc-devel (which I'm starting to think should just > be called rpcgen) shouldn't obsolete sunrpc too instead of this. I went for a new name because rpcgen was just rpcgen, and the new package is rpcgen + inc

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-21 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello, Corinna. Wednesday, August 20, 2014, 23:14:35 you wrote: > Packaging looks good, basically, but the executables are in /usr/bin, > while on Linux they are in /usr/sbin. Would you mind to move them? No, i don't mind. I will. > Btw., can you give a quick overview what's going to happen w

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-20 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-08-20 13:22, Pavel Fedin wrote: Hello! I have completed rpcbind package and would like to offer it for the upload. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ah2v9q1we8wl1oe/AACHiGJcCp6-oBrL2KEn7E7Wa?dl=0 The same as onc-rpc-devel, this is x86-64-only for now. Comments follow. OBSOLETES="sunr

Re: [ITP] rpcbind 0.2.1

2014-08-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Pavel, On Aug 20 22:22, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > I have completed rpcbind package and would like to offer it for the > upload. > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ah2v9q1we8wl1oe/AACHiGJcCp6-oBrL2KEn7E7Wa?dl=0 > The same as onc-rpc-devel, this is x86-64-only for now. Packaging looks good, b