Thanks for doing this, David.
I'm not sure what the protocol should be here wrt ChangeLogs. Danny had been
updating the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw. I guess it makes sense to use that when
updating the branch with unapproved changes and to use the regular ChangeLog
with changes that already exist in
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [cygwin gcc-3.1] libjava/testsuite/lib/libjava.exp patch
Thanks for doing this, David.
I'm not sure what the protocol should be here wrt ChangeLogs. Danny had been
updating the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw. I guess it makes sense to use that when
updating the b
10:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [cygwin gcc-3.1] libjava/testsuite/lib/libjava.exp patch
I didn't even notice the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw files, as I was
working elsewhere. I would prefer to use them and will make the
appropriate changes.
-Original Message-
From: Christ
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:00:14AM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
>I didn't even notice the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw files, as I was
>working elsewhere. I would prefer to use them and will make the
>appropriate changes.
I don't think they exist everywhere, yet.
Do you think we should
--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at
10:00:14AM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
> >I didn't even notice the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw files, as I was
> >working elsewhere. I would prefer to use them and will make the
> >appropriate changes.
>
> I d
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:04:47PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> --- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at
>10:00:14AM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
>> >I didn't even notice the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw files, as I was
>> >working elsewhere. I would prefer