Re: 3rd summary (was Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.)

2005-10-05 Thread Dean Scarff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Corinna Vinschen writes: > Below are the results as of today 2005-10-03. It would be helpful if all > maintainers could scan this lists again, so that we're sure that nothing [snip] > LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR > ==

Re: 3rd summary (was Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.)

2005-10-03 Thread Nicholas Wourms
On 10/3/05, Corinna Vinschen wrote: [SNIP] > clear Wasn't this moved to obsolete? Cheers, Nicholas

RE: 3rd summary (was Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.)

2005-10-03 Thread Robb, Sam
> > > > So, ALL maintainers of Cygwin packages, > > > > please reply to this mail within the next six weeks, > > > > including a list of ALL packages you maintain. > > I'm the maintainer for the following packages: cramfs e2fsimage e2fsprogs mtd nfs

Re: 3rd summary (was Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.)

2005-10-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:47:01AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >FYI, Dan just released naim-0.11.8 (yes, from Fort Benning), so I'm >assuming he's actively maintaining naim... The purpose of this exercise is to see who is actually actively maintaini

Re: 3rd summary (was Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.)

2005-10-03 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Below are the results as of today 2005-10-03. > [snip] > LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR > = > [snip] > naim FYI, Dan just released naim-0.11.8 (yes, from Fort Benning), so I'