Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: -- lame ascii art ++ | BB | -- my spiffy new Cygwin Bash Maintainer Hat ;) | AA | | SS | | HH | +-Cygwin-+ | o o | | || | \ \__/ / \/ /lame

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:40:28PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:46:47AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: snipped the lame ASCII art inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there anything stoping us

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:17:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of naming the binary 'aspell-bin'. I'd like to change that. Otherwise we have a base

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-18 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:17:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of naming the binary 'aspell-bin'.

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-18 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:30:32AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:17:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people do it to me) but I didn't notice

RE: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-18 Thread Gareth Pearce
AFAIC, we're ready. I'll repeat the URLs for the dictionaries: 04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:34:26AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: In practice there is one niggle, the src package generates aspell-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 already - but it's the amalgam of all of the other binary packages. It produces aspell-bin. Fixing this will probably only take me a couple of minutes

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-15 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: -- lame ascii art ++ | BB | -- my spiffy new Cygwin Bash Maintainer Hat ;) | AA | | SS | | HH | +-Cygwin-+ | o o | | || | \ \__/ /

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-15 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
You haven't marked them as test while gcc-3.3.1 isn't canonical yet. It won't harm (much) I think, but it might if someone wants to go ahead and develop something with libaspell.. rlc On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:53:52PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-15 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
FWIW, the dictionary files are now here: 04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2 http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2 I did not regenerate

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-15 Thread Gareth Pearce
Doh - i forgot gcc 3.3.1 is 'test' - but indeed - if theres Anyone who wants to develop with libaspell before gcc test version goes real - i think they can use the test ... no? I dont really think that aspell needs to be marked as test because of this. Gareth You haven't marked them as test