On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
--
lame ascii art
++
| BB | -- my spiffy new Cygwin Bash Maintainer Hat ;)
| AA |
| SS |
| HH |
+-Cygwin-+
| o o |
| || |
\ \__/ /
\/
/lame
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:40:28PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:46:47AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
snipped the lame ASCII art
inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there anything stoping us
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:17:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people
do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of
naming the binary 'aspell-bin'. I'd like to change that. Otherwise
we have a base
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:17:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people
do it to me) but I didn't notice the slightly nonstandard practice of
naming the binary 'aspell-bin'.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:30:32AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:17:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I hate to do this at this late point (and I *really* hate it when people
do it to me) but I didn't notice
AFAIC, we're ready.
I'll repeat the URLs for the dictionaries:
04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:34:26AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
In practice there is one niggle, the src package generates
aspell-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2 already - but it's the amalgam of all of the other
binary packages. It produces aspell-bin. Fixing this will probably only
take me a couple of minutes
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
--
lame ascii art
++
| BB | -- my spiffy new Cygwin Bash Maintainer Hat ;)
| AA |
| SS |
| HH |
+-Cygwin-+
| o o |
| || |
\ \__/ /
You haven't marked them as test while gcc-3.3.1 isn't canonical yet. It
won't harm (much) I think, but it might if someone wants to go ahead and
develop something with libaspell..
rlc
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:53:52PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there
FWIW, the dictionary files are now here:
04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2
http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2
I did not regenerate
Doh - i forgot gcc 3.3.1 is 'test' - but indeed - if theres Anyone who wants
to develop with libaspell before gcc test version goes real - i think they
can use the test ... no?
I dont really think that aspell needs to be marked as test because of this.
Gareth
You haven't marked them as test
11 matches
Mail list logo