RE: Fixes to allow command line options to properly work

2004-10-11 Thread Amir Ebrahimi
Hannu, Were you referring to my changes or the filename? I realize that Outlook appended the .dat extension to the file. However, if you just saved the file and renamed it, then it should have worked. Igor, sorry about submitting the whole ChangeLog. This is the first time I've contributed to

RE: Fixes to allow command line options to properly work

2004-10-11 Thread Brian Ford
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Amir Ebrahimi wrote: Igor, sorry about submitting the whole ChangeLog. This is the first time I've contributed to a project ;) Should I have included my ChangeLog diff in my patch file? No, just your entry as plain text. See: http://cygwin.com/contrib.html (When you

RE: Fixes to allow command line options to properly work

2004-10-11 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote: Amir Ebrahimi wrote on Saturday, October 09, 2004 3:07 AM : I have attached my patch file and ChangeLog for review. Amir, please review your patch. The attched thing seems very odd. Huh? I can't see off-hand

RE: Fixes to allow command line options to properly work

2004-10-11 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen
Amir Ebrahimi wrote: Hannu, Were you referring to my changes or the filename? I realize that Outlook appended the .dat extension to the file. However, if you just saved the file and renamed it, then it should have worked. No - sorry for butting in - my comments had less value than I

RE: Fixes to allow command line options to properly work

2004-10-09 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen
Amir Ebrahimi wrote on Saturday, October 09, 2004 3:07 AM : I have attached my patch file and ChangeLog for review. Amir, please review your patch. The attched thing seems very odd. /Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE Microcomputer systems--72-- ** mailing list preference; please keep